<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Palacios-Baena ZR</submitter><funding>National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases</funding><funding>NIAID NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><pagination>1615-1623</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5849995</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>65(10)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>There is little information about the efficacy of active alternative drugs to carbapenems except β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors for the treatment of bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E). The objective of this study was to assess the outcomes of patients with BSI due to ESBL-E who received empiric therapy with such drugs (other active drugs [OADs]) or carbapenems.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A multinational retrospective cohort study of patients with BSI due to ESBL-E who received empiric treatment with OADs or carbapenems was performed. Cox regression including a propensity score for receiving OADs was performed to analyze 30-day all-cause mortality as main outcome. Clinical failure and length of stay were also analyzed.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Overall, 335 patients were included; 249 received empiric carbapenems and 86 OADs. The most frequent OADs were aminoglycosides (43 patients) and fluoroquinolones (20 patients). Empiric therapy with OADs was not associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], .38-1.48) in the Cox regression analysis. Propensity score-matched pairs, subgroups, and sensitivity analyses did not show different trends; specifically, the adjusted HR for aminoglycosides was 1.05 (95% CI, .51-2.16). OADs were neither associated with 14-day clinical failure (adjusted odds ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, .29-1.36) nor length of hospital stay.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>We were unable to show that empiric treatment with OAD was associated with a worse outcome compared with carbapenems. This information allows more options to be considered for empiric therapy, at least for some patients, depending on local susceptibility patterns of ESBL-E.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America</journal><pubmed_title>Empiric Therapy With Carbapenem-Sparing Regimens for Bloodstream Infections due to Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae: Results From the INCREMENT Cohort.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5849995</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 AI063517</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01AI072219 and R01AI063517</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AI072219</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Pintado V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ruiz-Garbajosa P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Oliver A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gonzalez V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Machuca I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Calbo E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tacconelli E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de la Calle C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Molina J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Almela M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Galvez J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Molina Gil-Bermejo J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Prim N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Farinas MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hamprecht A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cano ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hsueh PR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Antoniadou A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bou G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Azap OK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Virmani D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hernandez A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Russo A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gozalo M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tuon FF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roilides E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Akova M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Doi Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Falcone M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Karaiskos I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rodriguez-Bano J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pascual A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Venditti M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tsakris A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Badia C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bermejo J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ruiz de Gopegui E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Palacios-Baena ZR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lowman W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Almirante B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martinez-Martinez L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fontanals D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sahin AO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carmeli Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>San Juan R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Peter S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Torre-Cisneros J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pano-Pardo JR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pitout J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pournaras S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Martinez JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giannella M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schwaber MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Souli M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Puig M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Viale P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Perez F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Navarro F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mirelis B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Daikos G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gomez-Zorrilla S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fernandez-Ruiz M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tumbarello M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jove E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Poulakou G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morata L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mora-Rillo M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pena C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gasch O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bonomo RA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giamarellou H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bartoletti M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gomez J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xercavins M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Paterson DL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gutierrez-Gutierrez B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Larrosa N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Trecarichi EM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Iosifidis E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Helvaci O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marinescu CI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rucci V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zarkotou O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tubau F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Losito AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cano A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Empiric Therapy With Carbapenem-Sparing Regimens for Bloodstream Infections due to Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae: Results From the INCREMENT Cohort.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>There is little information about the efficacy of active alternative drugs to carbapenems except β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors for the treatment of bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E). The objective of this study was to assess the outcomes of patients with BSI due to ESBL-E who received empiric therapy with such drugs (other active drugs [OADs]) or carbapenems.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A multinational retrospective cohort study of patients with BSI due to ESBL-E who received empiric treatment with OADs or carbapenems was performed. Cox regression including a propensity score for receiving OADs was performed to analyze 30-day all-cause mortality as main outcome. Clinical failure and length of stay were also analyzed.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Overall, 335 patients were included; 249 received empiric carbapenems and 86 OADs. The most frequent OADs were aminoglycosides (43 patients) and fluoroquinolones (20 patients). Empiric therapy with OADs was not associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], .38-1.48) in the Cox regression analysis. Propensity score-matched pairs, subgroups, and sensitivity analyses did not show different trends; specifically, the adjusted HR for aminoglycosides was 1.05 (95% CI, .51-2.16). OADs were neither associated with 14-day clinical failure (adjusted odds ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, .29-1.36) nor length of hospital stay.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>We were unable to show that empiric treatment with OAD was associated with a worse outcome compared with carbapenems. This information allows more options to be considered for empiric therapy, at least for some patients, depending on local susceptibility patterns of ESBL-E.</description><dates><release>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2017 Oct</publication><modification>2026-05-02T06:49:26.274Z</modification><creation>2026-04-07T17:42:11.477Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5849995</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29020250</pubmed><doi>10.1093/cid/cix606</doi></cross_references></HashMap>