{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["8(3)"],"submitter":["McGreevy P"],"funding":["RSPCA"],"pubmed_abstract":["The aim of this study was to conduct a series of paper-based exercises in order to assess the negative (adverse) welfare impacts, if any, of common interventions on domestic horses across a broad range of different contexts of equine care and training. An international panel (with professional expertise in psychology, equitation science, veterinary science, education, welfare, equestrian coaching, advocacy, and community engagement; n = 16) met over a four-day period to define and assess these interventions, using an adaptation of the domain-based assessment model. The interventions were considered within 14 contexts: C1 Weaning; C2 Diet; C3 Housing; C4 Foundation training; C5 Ill-health and veterinary interventions (chiefly medical); C6 Ill-health and veterinary interventions (chiefly sur"],"journal":["Animals : an open access journal from MDPI"],"pagination":["E41"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5867529"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Using the Five Domains Model to Assess the Adverse Impacts of Husbandry, Veterinary, and Equitation Interventions on Horse Welfare."],"pmcid":["PMC5867529"],"pubmed_authors":["Yeates J","Webster J","Wolfensohn S","Berger J","Fiedler J","McLean A","Jones B","Jones C","Doherty O","Nakonechny L","Nicol C","McGreevy P","McDonnell S","Harrison A","de Brauwere N","Preshaw L","Tzioumis V","Thomson P"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Using the Five Domains Model to Assess the Adverse Impacts of Husbandry, Veterinary, and Equitation Interventions on Horse Welfare.","description":"The aim of this study was to conduct a series of paper-based exercises in order to assess the negative (adverse) welfare impacts, if any, of common interventions on domestic horses across a broad range of different contexts of equine care and training. An international panel (with professional expertise in psychology, equitation science, veterinary science, education, welfare, equestrian coaching, advocacy, and community engagement; n = 16) met over a four-day period to define and assess these interventions, using an adaptation of the domain-based assessment model. The interventions were considered within 14 contexts: C1 Weaning; C2 Diet; C3 Housing; C4 Foundation training; C5 Ill-health and veterinary interventions (chiefly medical); C6 Ill-health and veterinary interventions (chiefly sur","dates":{"release":"2018-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2018 Mar","modification":"2025-04-04T23:12:17.656Z","creation":"2019-03-26T23:20:48Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC5867529","cross_references":{"pubmed":["29562654"],"doi":["10.3390/ani8030041"]}}