<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>8(3)</volume><submitter>McGreevy P</submitter><funding>RSPCA</funding><pubmed_abstract>The aim of this study was to conduct a series of paper-based exercises in order to assess the negative (adverse) welfare impacts, if any, of common interventions on domestic horses across a broad range of different contexts of equine care and training. An international panel (with professional expertise in psychology, equitation science, veterinary science, education, welfare, equestrian coaching, advocacy, and community engagement; n = 16) met over a four-day period to define and assess these interventions, using an adaptation of the domain-based assessment model. The interventions were considered within 14 contexts: C1 Weaning; C2 Diet; C3 Housing; C4 Foundation training; C5 Ill-health and veterinary interventions (chiefly medical); C6 Ill-health and veterinary interventions (chiefly sur</pubmed_abstract><journal>Animals : an open access journal from MDPI</journal><pagination>E41</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5867529</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Using the Five Domains Model to Assess the Adverse Impacts of Husbandry, Veterinary, and Equitation Interventions on Horse Welfare.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5867529</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Yeates J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Webster J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wolfensohn S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berger J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fiedler J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McLean A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jones B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jones C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Doherty O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nakonechny L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nicol C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McGreevy P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McDonnell S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Harrison A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Brauwere N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Preshaw L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tzioumis V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Thomson P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Using the Five Domains Model to Assess the Adverse Impacts of Husbandry, Veterinary, and Equitation Interventions on Horse Welfare.</name><description>The aim of this study was to conduct a series of paper-based exercises in order to assess the negative (adverse) welfare impacts, if any, of common interventions on domestic horses across a broad range of different contexts of equine care and training. An international panel (with professional expertise in psychology, equitation science, veterinary science, education, welfare, equestrian coaching, advocacy, and community engagement; n = 16) met over a four-day period to define and assess these interventions, using an adaptation of the domain-based assessment model. The interventions were considered within 14 contexts: C1 Weaning; C2 Diet; C3 Housing; C4 Foundation training; C5 Ill-health and veterinary interventions (chiefly medical); C6 Ill-health and veterinary interventions (chiefly sur</description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018 Mar</publication><modification>2025-04-04T23:12:17.656Z</modification><creation>2019-03-26T23:20:48Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5867529</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29562654</pubmed><doi>10.3390/ani8030041</doi></cross_references></HashMap>