<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Hailemichael Y</submitter><funding>UT MD Anderson Cancer Center SPORE in Melanoma grant from NCI</funding><funding>NA</funding><funding>NIAID NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas</funding><pagination>1338-1354</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5873868</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>128(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Anticancer vaccination is a promising approach to increase the efficacy of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint blockade therapies. However, the landmark FDA registration trial for anti-CTLA-4 therapy (ipilimumab) revealed a complete lack of benefit of adding vaccination with gp100 peptide formulated in incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA). Here, using a mouse model of melanoma, we found that gp100 vaccination induced gp100-specific effector T cells (Teffs), which dominantly forced trafficking of anti-CTLA-4-induced, non-gp100-specific Teffs away from the tumor, reducing tumor control. The inflamed vaccination site subsequently also sequestered and destroyed anti-CTLA-4-induced Teffs with specificities for tumor antigens other </pubmed_abstract><journal>The Journal of clinical investigation</journal><pubmed_title>Cancer vaccine formulation dictates synergy with CTLA-4 and PD-L1 checkpoint blockade therapy.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5873868</pmcid><funding_grant_id>NA</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>RP140522</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P50 CA093459</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 AI007496</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P30 CA044579</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Fu T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sharma P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hasan F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Xiao Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Khong H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hailemichael Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roszik J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schluns KS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vianden C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>He Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Anthony SM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dai Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sharma M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Woods A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nielsen MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Overwijk WW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Singh M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Engelhard VH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Faak F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moore D</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Cancer vaccine formulation dictates synergy with CTLA-4 and PD-L1 checkpoint blockade therapy.</name><description>Anticancer vaccination is a promising approach to increase the efficacy of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint blockade therapies. However, the landmark FDA registration trial for anti-CTLA-4 therapy (ipilimumab) revealed a complete lack of benefit of adding vaccination with gp100 peptide formulated in incomplete Freund's adjuvant (IFA). Here, using a mouse model of melanoma, we found that gp100 vaccination induced gp100-specific effector T cells (Teffs), which dominantly forced trafficking of anti-CTLA-4-induced, non-gp100-specific Teffs away from the tumor, reducing tumor control. The inflamed vaccination site subsequently also sequestered and destroyed anti-CTLA-4-induced Teffs with specificities for tumor antigens other </description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018 Apr</publication><modification>2026-05-05T23:35:01.296Z</modification><creation>2019-03-26T23:44:12Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5873868</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29480817</pubmed><doi>10.1172/jci93303</doi><doi>10.1172/JCI93303</doi></cross_references></HashMap>