<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>2(8)</volume><submitter>Stahl M</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Although hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are frequently used in the frontline treatment of older acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, little is known about their effectiveness in relapsed or primary treatment-refractory (RR)-AML. Using an international multicenter retrospective database, we studied the effectiveness of HMAs in RR-AML and evaluated for predictors of response and overall survival (OS). A total of 655 patients from 12 centers received azacitidine (57%) or decitabine (43%), including 290 refractory (44%) and 365 relapsed (56%) patients. Median age at diagnosis was 65 years. Best response to HMAs was complete remission (CR; 11%) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi; 5.3%). Additionally, 8.5% experienced hematologic improvement. Median OS was 6.7 months (95% confidence interval, 6.1-7.3). As expected, OS differed significantly by best response, with patients achieving CR and CRi having a median OS of 25.3 and 14.6 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the presence of ≤5% circulating blasts and a 10-day schedule of decitabine were associated with improved response rates, whereas the presence of >5% circulating blasts and >20% bone marrow blasts were associated with decreased OS. A significant subset of RR-AML patients (16%) achieved CR/CRi with HMAs and experienced a median OS of 21 months. Outside of a clinical trial, HMAs represent a reasonable therapeutic option for some patients with RR-AML.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Blood advances</journal><pagination>923-932</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC5916007</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Hypomethylating agents in relapsed and refractory AML: outcomes and their predictors in a large international patient cohort.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC5916007</pmcid><pubmed_authors>DeVeaux M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barnard JD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Al-Kali A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fenaux P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cluzeau T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vey N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Litzow MR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zeidan AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bergua JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ritchie EK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brunner AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Verma V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Komrokji RS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Germing U</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stahl M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sekeres MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gore SD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roboz GJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Perreault S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Prebet T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bhatt VR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fathi AT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Montesinos P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Itzykson R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Santini V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Serrano J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim TK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Podoltsev NA</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Hypomethylating agents in relapsed and refractory AML: outcomes and their predictors in a large international patient cohort.</name><description>Although hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are frequently used in the frontline treatment of older acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, little is known about their effectiveness in relapsed or primary treatment-refractory (RR)-AML. Using an international multicenter retrospective database, we studied the effectiveness of HMAs in RR-AML and evaluated for predictors of response and overall survival (OS). A total of 655 patients from 12 centers received azacitidine (57%) or decitabine (43%), including 290 refractory (44%) and 365 relapsed (56%) patients. Median age at diagnosis was 65 years. Best response to HMAs was complete remission (CR; 11%) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi; 5.3%). Additionally, 8.5% experienced hematologic improvement. Median OS was 6.7 months (95% confidence interval, 6.1-7.3). As expected, OS differed significantly by best response, with patients achieving CR and CRi having a median OS of 25.3 and 14.6 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the presence of ≤5% circulating blasts and a 10-day schedule of decitabine were associated with improved response rates, whereas the presence of >5% circulating blasts and >20% bone marrow blasts were associated with decreased OS. A significant subset of RR-AML patients (16%) achieved CR/CRi with HMAs and experienced a median OS of 21 months. Outside of a clinical trial, HMAs represent a reasonable therapeutic option for some patients with RR-AML.</description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018 Apr</publication><modification>2024-11-20T08:47:00.704Z</modification><creation>2019-03-26T23:36:27Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC5916007</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29685952</pubmed><doi>10.1182/bloodadvances.2018016121</doi></cross_references></HashMap>