{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["2018"],"submitter":["Kwon CY"],"funding":["Health Fellowship Foundation"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Objectives</h4>To analyze the efficacy and safety of auricular acupuncture (AA) in patients with cognitive impairment and dementia.<h4>Methods</h4>Twelve electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating effects of AA in patients with cognitive impairment and/or dementia, from their inception to August 2017. The primary outcome was cognitive function, and secondary outcomes were self-care ability, quality of life, clinical efficacy rate, and incidences of adverse events.<h4>Results</h4>Nine studies were included, and five involving 677 participants were analyzed quantitatively. Compared with Western medications (WM), AA had mixed effects on cognitive functions (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE], mean difference [MD] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.02 to 1.48; Hierarchic Dementia Scale [HDS], MD 2.21, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.33); there was no significant improvement in the activities of daily living (ADL) score (MD 0.20, 95% CI -3.51 to 3.91) in patients with vascular dementia (VD). Compared to WM, AA combined with WM showed better clinical efficacy rate (risk ratio [RR] 1.42, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.91) in patients with VD; there was no significant improvement in cognitive functions (MMSE, MD 0.97, 95% CI -0.44 to 2.38; Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA], MD 0.22, 95% CI -1.83 to 2.27) in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Compared to herbal medicine (HM), AA plus HM showed significant improvements in cognitive function (MMSE, MD 1.31, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.49) in patients with MCI and patients with vascular cognitive impairment, no dementia (VCIND) and in ADL score (MD -6.70, 95% CI -8.78 to -4.62) in patients with MCI. No adverse event associated with AA was reported.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The evidence reveals mixed efficacy of AA in patients with cognitive impairment and/or dementia. However, the results were inconclusive because of the small number and poor methodological quality of the included studies."],"journal":["Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM"],"pagination":["3426078"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6000857"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Efficacy and Safety of Auricular Acupuncture for Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review."],"pmcid":["PMC6000857"],"pubmed_authors":["Lee B","Chung SY","Kwon CY","Suh HW","Kim JW"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Efficacy and Safety of Auricular Acupuncture for Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review.","description":"<h4>Objectives</h4>To analyze the efficacy and safety of auricular acupuncture (AA) in patients with cognitive impairment and dementia.<h4>Methods</h4>Twelve electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating effects of AA in patients with cognitive impairment and/or dementia, from their inception to August 2017. The primary outcome was cognitive function, and secondary outcomes were self-care ability, quality of life, clinical efficacy rate, and incidences of adverse events.<h4>Results</h4>Nine studies were included, and five involving 677 participants were analyzed quantitatively. Compared with Western medications (WM), AA had mixed effects on cognitive functions (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE], mean difference [MD] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.02 to 1.48; Hierarchic Dementia Scale [HDS], MD 2.21, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.33); there was no significant improvement in the activities of daily living (ADL) score (MD 0.20, 95% CI -3.51 to 3.91) in patients with vascular dementia (VD). Compared to WM, AA combined with WM showed better clinical efficacy rate (risk ratio [RR] 1.42, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.91) in patients with VD; there was no significant improvement in cognitive functions (MMSE, MD 0.97, 95% CI -0.44 to 2.38; Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA], MD 0.22, 95% CI -1.83 to 2.27) in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Compared to herbal medicine (HM), AA plus HM showed significant improvements in cognitive function (MMSE, MD 1.31, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.49) in patients with MCI and patients with vascular cognitive impairment, no dementia (VCIND) and in ADL score (MD -6.70, 95% CI -8.78 to -4.62) in patients with MCI. No adverse event associated with AA was reported.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The evidence reveals mixed efficacy of AA in patients with cognitive impairment and/or dementia. However, the results were inconclusive because of the small number and poor methodological quality of the included studies.","dates":{"release":"2018-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2018","modification":"2025-04-18T14:09:37.675Z","creation":"2019-03-26T23:43:29Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC6000857","cross_references":{"pubmed":["29955234"],"doi":["10.1155/2018/3426078"]}}