<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>2018</volume><submitter>Kwon CY</submitter><funding>Health Fellowship Foundation</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To analyze the efficacy and safety of auricular acupuncture (AA) in patients with cognitive impairment and dementia.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Twelve electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating effects of AA in patients with cognitive impairment and/or dementia, from their inception to August 2017. The primary outcome was cognitive function, and secondary outcomes were self-care ability, quality of life, clinical efficacy rate, and incidences of adverse events.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Nine studies were included, and five involving 677 participants were analyzed quantitatively. Compared with Western medications (WM), AA had mixed effects on cognitive functions (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE], mean difference [MD] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.02 to 1.48; Hierarchic Dementia Scale [HDS], MD 2.21, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.33); there was no significant improvement in the activities of daily living (ADL) score (MD 0.20, 95% CI -3.51 to 3.91) in patients with vascular dementia (VD). Compared to WM, AA combined with WM showed better clinical efficacy rate (risk ratio [RR] 1.42, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.91) in patients with VD; there was no significant improvement in cognitive functions (MMSE, MD 0.97, 95% CI -0.44 to 2.38; Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA], MD 0.22, 95% CI -1.83 to 2.27) in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Compared to herbal medicine (HM), AA plus HM showed significant improvements in cognitive function (MMSE, MD 1.31, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.49) in patients with MCI and patients with vascular cognitive impairment, no dementia (VCIND) and in ADL score (MD -6.70, 95% CI -8.78 to -4.62) in patients with MCI. No adverse event associated with AA was reported.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The evidence reveals mixed efficacy of AA in patients with cognitive impairment and/or dementia. However, the results were inconclusive because of the small number and poor methodological quality of the included studies.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM</journal><pagination>3426078</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6000857</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Efficacy and Safety of Auricular Acupuncture for Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6000857</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Lee B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chung SY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kwon CY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Suh HW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim JW</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Efficacy and Safety of Auricular Acupuncture for Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: A Systematic Review.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To analyze the efficacy and safety of auricular acupuncture (AA) in patients with cognitive impairment and dementia.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Twelve electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating effects of AA in patients with cognitive impairment and/or dementia, from their inception to August 2017. The primary outcome was cognitive function, and secondary outcomes were self-care ability, quality of life, clinical efficacy rate, and incidences of adverse events.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Nine studies were included, and five involving 677 participants were analyzed quantitatively. Compared with Western medications (WM), AA had mixed effects on cognitive functions (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE], mean difference [MD] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.02 to 1.48; Hierarchic Dementia Scale [HDS], MD 2.21, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.33); there was no significant improvement in the activities of daily living (ADL) score (MD 0.20, 95% CI -3.51 to 3.91) in patients with vascular dementia (VD). Compared to WM, AA combined with WM showed better clinical efficacy rate (risk ratio [RR] 1.42, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.91) in patients with VD; there was no significant improvement in cognitive functions (MMSE, MD 0.97, 95% CI -0.44 to 2.38; Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA], MD 0.22, 95% CI -1.83 to 2.27) in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Compared to herbal medicine (HM), AA plus HM showed significant improvements in cognitive function (MMSE, MD 1.31, 95% CI 0.13 to 2.49) in patients with MCI and patients with vascular cognitive impairment, no dementia (VCIND) and in ADL score (MD -6.70, 95% CI -8.78 to -4.62) in patients with MCI. No adverse event associated with AA was reported.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The evidence reveals mixed efficacy of AA in patients with cognitive impairment and/or dementia. However, the results were inconclusive because of the small number and poor methodological quality of the included studies.</description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018</publication><modification>2025-04-18T14:09:37.675Z</modification><creation>2019-03-26T23:43:29Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6000857</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29955234</pubmed><doi>10.1155/2018/3426078</doi></cross_references></HashMap>