<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Ronda MCM</submitter><funding>Diabetes Fonds</funding><pagination>94</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6013979</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>19(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>To gain insight into the opinions and working methods of diabetes care providers after using a diabetes web portal for 4 years in order to understand the role of the provider in patients' web portal use.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Survey among physicians and nurses from general practices and an outpatient clinic, correlated with data from the common web portal.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>One hundred twenty-eight questionnaires were analysed (response rate 56.6%). Responders' mean age was 46.2 ± 9.8 years and 43.8% were physicians. The majority was of opinion that the portal improves patients' diabetes knowledge (90.6%) and quality of care (72.7%). Although uploading glucose diary (93.6%) and patient access to laboratory and clinical notes (91.2 and 71.0%) were considered important, these features were recommended to patients in only 71.8 and 19.5% respectively. 64.8% declared they informed their patients about the portal and 45.3% handed-out the information leaflet and website address. The portal was especially recommended to type 1 diabetes patients (78.3%); those on insulin (84.3%) and patients aged&lt; 65 years (72.4%). Few found it timesaving (21.9%). Diabetes care providers' opinions were not associated with patients' portal use.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Providers are positive about patients web portals but still not recommend or encourage the use to all patients. There seems room for improvement in their working methods.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC family practice</journal><pubmed_title>Diabetes care providers' opinions and working methods after four years of experience with a diabetes patient web portal; a survey among health care providers in general practices and an outpatient clinic.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6013979</pmcid><funding_grant_id>2010.13.1369</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Dijkhorst-Oei LT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ronda MCM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vos RC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rutten GEHM</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Diabetes care providers' opinions and working methods after four years of experience with a diabetes patient web portal; a survey among health care providers in general practices and an outpatient clinic.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>To gain insight into the opinions and working methods of diabetes care providers after using a diabetes web portal for 4 years in order to understand the role of the provider in patients' web portal use.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Survey among physicians and nurses from general practices and an outpatient clinic, correlated with data from the common web portal.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>One hundred twenty-eight questionnaires were analysed (response rate 56.6%). Responders' mean age was 46.2 ± 9.8 years and 43.8% were physicians. The majority was of opinion that the portal improves patients' diabetes knowledge (90.6%) and quality of care (72.7%). Although uploading glucose diary (93.6%) and patient access to laboratory and clinical notes (91.2 and 71.0%) were considered important, these features were recommended to patients in only 71.8 and 19.5% respectively. 64.8% declared they informed their patients about the portal and 45.3% handed-out the information leaflet and website address. The portal was especially recommended to type 1 diabetes patients (78.3%); those on insulin (84.3%) and patients aged&lt; 65 years (72.4%). Few found it timesaving (21.9%). Diabetes care providers' opinions were not associated with patients' portal use.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Providers are positive about patients web portals but still not recommend or encourage the use to all patients. There seems room for improvement in their working methods.</description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018 Jun</publication><modification>2024-12-03T15:55:21.545Z</modification><creation>2019-03-26T23:44:39Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6013979</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29929483</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12875-018-0781-y</doi></cross_references></HashMap>