<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>7(8)</volume><submitter>Briasoulis A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>We examined a large community-based sample of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and valvular heart disease (VHD) (excluding prosthetic valves) with a goal to compare outcomes among patients with AF, with and without VHD, taking warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban. We identified Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Part D benefit plan from 2011 to 2013 with newly diagnosed AF (18 137 patients with VHD [dabigatran, 1979; rivaroxaban, 2027; warfarin, 14 131] and 85 596 patients without VHD [dabigatran, 13 522; rivaroxaban, 14 257; warfarin, 57 817]). Primary outcomes of all-cause mortality, ischemic strokes, major bleeding, and myocardial infarction were compared across the 3 anticoagulants using 3-way propensity-matched samples. After propensity matching, a total of 5871 patien</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of the American Heart Association</journal><pagination>e008773</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6015407</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Safety and Efficacy of Novel Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Medicare Beneficiaries With Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Disease.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6015407</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Briasoulis A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Panaich S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Akintoye E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alvarez P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Inampudi C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vaughan-Sarrazin M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Safety and Efficacy of Novel Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Medicare Beneficiaries With Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart Disease.</name><description>We examined a large community-based sample of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and valvular heart disease (VHD) (excluding prosthetic valves) with a goal to compare outcomes among patients with AF, with and without VHD, taking warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban. We identified Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Part D benefit plan from 2011 to 2013 with newly diagnosed AF (18 137 patients with VHD [dabigatran, 1979; rivaroxaban, 2027; warfarin, 14 131] and 85 596 patients without VHD [dabigatran, 13 522; rivaroxaban, 14 257; warfarin, 57 817]). Primary outcomes of all-cause mortality, ischemic strokes, major bleeding, and myocardial infarction were compared across the 3 anticoagulants using 3-way propensity-matched samples. After propensity matching, a total of 5871 patien</description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018 Apr</publication><modification>2025-04-25T19:55:58.818Z</modification><creation>2019-03-26T23:44:40Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6015407</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29622591</pubmed><doi>10.1161/JAHA.118.008773</doi></cross_references></HashMap>