<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores><citationCount>0</citationCount><reanalysisCount>0</reanalysisCount><viewCount>55</viewCount><searchCount>0</searchCount></scores><additional><submitter>Bergstrom HC</submitter><funding>Intramural NIH HHS</funding><funding>NICHD NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIDA NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIAAA NIH HHS</funding><pagination>2264-2272</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6015733</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>23(8)</volume><pubmed_abstract>In current models, learning the relationship between environmental stimuli and the outcomes of actions involves both stimulus-driven and goal-directed systems, mediated in part by the DLS and DMS, respectively. However, though these models emphasize the importance of the DLS in governing actions after extensive experience has accumulated, there is growing evidence of DLS engagement from the onset of training. Here, we used in vivo photosilencing to reveal that DLS recruitment interferes with early touchscreen discrimination learning. We also show that the direct output pathway of the DLS is preferentially recruited and causally involved in early learning and find that silencing the normal contribution of the DLS produces plasticity-related alterations in a PL-DMS circuit. These data provide further evidence suggesting that the DLS is recruited in the construction of stimulus-elicited actions that ultimately automate behavior and liberate cognitive resources for other demands, but with a cost to performance at the outset of learning.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Cell reports</journal><pubmed_title>Dorsolateral Striatum Engagement Interferes with Early Discrimination Learning.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6015733</pmcid><funding_grant_id>U54 HD083211</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AA019455</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R37 AA019455</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K99 AA022651</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 DA042475</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>Z99 AA999999</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R00 AA022651</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>ZIA AA000411-14</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Brockway ET</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Taylor WW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wills TA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lieberman AG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bergstrom HC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pickens CL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rubio FJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li X</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Holmes A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pinard CR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gunduz-Cinar O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lipkin AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nonaka M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Winder DG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bukalo O</pubmed_authors><view_count>55</view_count></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Dorsolateral Striatum Engagement Interferes with Early Discrimination Learning.</name><description>In current models, learning the relationship between environmental stimuli and the outcomes of actions involves both stimulus-driven and goal-directed systems, mediated in part by the DLS and DMS, respectively. However, though these models emphasize the importance of the DLS in governing actions after extensive experience has accumulated, there is growing evidence of DLS engagement from the onset of training. Here, we used in vivo photosilencing to reveal that DLS recruitment interferes with early touchscreen discrimination learning. We also show that the direct output pathway of the DLS is preferentially recruited and causally involved in early learning and find that silencing the normal contribution of the DLS produces plasticity-related alterations in a PL-DMS circuit. These data provide further evidence suggesting that the DLS is recruited in the construction of stimulus-elicited actions that ultimately automate behavior and liberate cognitive resources for other demands, but with a cost to performance at the outset of learning.</description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018 May</publication><modification>2020-10-31T09:17:27Z</modification><creation>2019-03-26T23:42:48Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6015733</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29791838</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.081</doi></cross_references></HashMap>