<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores><citationCount>0</citationCount><reanalysisCount>0</reanalysisCount><viewCount>39</viewCount><searchCount>0</searchCount></scores><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>8(6)</volume><submitter>DeCensi A</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To assess Italian medical oncologists' opinion on the implications of conflict of interest (COI) on medical education, care and research, and to evaluate their direct financial relationships.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>National cross-sectional survey conducted between March and April 2017 among Italian oncologists.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Online survey sponsored by the Italian College of Medical Oncology Chiefs through its website.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Italian oncologists who filled out an anonymous questionnaire including 19 items and individual and working characteristics.&lt;h4>Main outcome measure&lt;/h4>The proportion of medical oncologists perceiving COI as an outstanding issue and those receiving direct payments from industry.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>There were 321 respondents, representing 13% of Italian tenured medical oncologists. Overall, 62% declared direct payments from the pharmaceutical industry in the last 3 years. Sixty-eight per cent felt the majority of Italian oncologists have a COI with industry, but 59% suppose this is not greater than that of other specialties. Eighty-two per cent consider that most oncology education is supported by industry. More than 75% believe that current allocation of industry budget on marketing and promotion rather than research and development is unfair, but 75% consider it appropriate to receive travel and lodging hospitality from industry. A median net profit margin of €5000 per patient enrolled in an industry trial was considered appropriate for the employee institution. Sixty per cent agree to receive a personal fee for patients enrolled in industry trials, but 79% state this should be reported in the informed consent. Over 90% believe that scientific societies should publish a financial report of industry support. Finally, 79% disagree to being a coauthor of an article written by a medical writer when no substantial scientific contribution is made.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Among Italian oncologists COI is perceived as an important issue influencing costs, education, care and science. A more rigorous policy on COI should be implemented.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open</journal><pagination>e020912</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6042593</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Conflict of interest among Italian medical oncologists: a national survey.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6042593</pmcid><pubmed_authors>DeCensi A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Livellara V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roila F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ruggeri B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tomirotti M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Webber TB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Verusio C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brandt K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Clerico M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Italian College of Chief Medical Oncologists (CIPOMO)</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giua C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Artioli F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Numico G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fioretto L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ballatori E</pubmed_authors><view_count>39</view_count></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Conflict of interest among Italian medical oncologists: a national survey.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To assess Italian medical oncologists' opinion on the implications of conflict of interest (COI) on medical education, care and research, and to evaluate their direct financial relationships.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>National cross-sectional survey conducted between March and April 2017 among Italian oncologists.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Online survey sponsored by the Italian College of Medical Oncology Chiefs through its website.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Italian oncologists who filled out an anonymous questionnaire including 19 items and individual and working characteristics.&lt;h4>Main outcome measure&lt;/h4>The proportion of medical oncologists perceiving COI as an outstanding issue and those receiving direct payments from industry.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>There were 321 respondents, representing 13% of Italian tenured medical oncologists. Overall, 62% declared direct payments from the pharmaceutical industry in the last 3 years. Sixty-eight per cent felt the majority of Italian oncologists have a COI with industry, but 59% suppose this is not greater than that of other specialties. Eighty-two per cent consider that most oncology education is supported by industry. More than 75% believe that current allocation of industry budget on marketing and promotion rather than research and development is unfair, but 75% consider it appropriate to receive travel and lodging hospitality from industry. A median net profit margin of €5000 per patient enrolled in an industry trial was considered appropriate for the employee institution. Sixty per cent agree to receive a personal fee for patients enrolled in industry trials, but 79% state this should be reported in the informed consent. Over 90% believe that scientific societies should publish a financial report of industry support. Finally, 79% disagree to being a coauthor of an article written by a medical writer when no substantial scientific contribution is made.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Among Italian oncologists COI is perceived as an important issue influencing costs, education, care and science. A more rigorous policy on COI should be implemented.</description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018 Jun</publication><modification>2024-12-03T15:55:57.38Z</modification><creation>2019-03-26T23:46:40Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6042593</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29961019</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020912</doi></cross_references></HashMap>