<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Comfort LN</submitter><funding>Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality</funding><funding>The Commonwealth Fund</funding><funding>Commonwealth Fund</funding><funding>NIA NIH HHS</funding><funding>AHRQ HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><funding>Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)</funding><funding>NIH HHS</funding><pagination>2303-2323</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6052017</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>53(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>OBJECTIVE:To examine whether an empirically derived taxonomy of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) is associated with quality and spending performance among patients of ACOs in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP). DATA SOURCES:Three waves of the National Survey of ACOs and corresponding publicly available Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services performance data for NSACO respondents participating in the MSSP (N = 204); SK&amp;A Office Based Physicians Database from QuintilesIMS. STUDY DESIGN:We compare the performance of three ACO types (physician-led, integrated, and hybrid) for three domains: quality, spending, and likelihood of achieving savings. Sources of performance variation within and between ACO types are compared for each performance measure. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:There is gr</pubmed_abstract><journal>Health services research</journal><pubmed_title>Medicare Accountable Care Organizations of Diverse Structures Achieve Comparable Quality and Cost Performance.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6052017</pmcid><funding_grant_id>#R33AG044251</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>#1U19HS024075</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R33 AG044251</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>#20130084</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 HS022241</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>#1T32HS022241-01</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>#20160616</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>#4T32HS022241</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U19 HS024075</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Comfort LN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rodriguez HP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shortell SM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Colla CH</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Medicare Accountable Care Organizations of Diverse Structures Achieve Comparable Quality and Cost Performance.</name><description>OBJECTIVE:To examine whether an empirically derived taxonomy of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) is associated with quality and spending performance among patients of ACOs in the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP). DATA SOURCES:Three waves of the National Survey of ACOs and corresponding publicly available Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services performance data for NSACO respondents participating in the MSSP (N = 204); SK&amp;A Office Based Physicians Database from QuintilesIMS. STUDY DESIGN:We compare the performance of three ACO types (physician-led, integrated, and hybrid) for three domains: quality, spending, and likelihood of achieving savings. Sources of performance variation within and between ACO types are compared for each performance measure. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:There is gr</description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018 Aug</publication><modification>2025-04-18T18:13:27.728Z</modification><creation>2019-08-07T07:01:13Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6052017</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29388199</pubmed><doi>10.1111/1475-6773.12829</doi></cross_references></HashMap>