<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>20(9)</volume><submitter>Sullivan SD</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>To compare clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) switching from insulin glargine 100 units/mL (Gla-100) or insulin detemir (IDet) to insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) or insulin degludec (IDeg).&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a retrospective, observational study of electronic medical records for Gla-300/IDeg adult switchers (March 1, 2015 to January 31, 2017) with active records for 12-month baseline (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] used a 6-month baseline period) and 6-month follow-up periods. Gla-300 and IDeg switchers were propensity score-matched using baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Outcomes were HbA1c change and goal attainment (among patients with HbA1c captured at follow-up), and hypoglycaemia with fixed follow-up (intention-to-treat [ITT]; 6 months) and variable follow-up (on-treatment [OT]; to discontinuation or 6 months).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Each matched cohort comprised 1592 patients. The mean decrease in HbA1c and HbA1c goal (&lt;7.0% [53 mmol/mol] and &lt;8.0% [64 mmol/mol]) attainment rates were similar for Gla-300 (n = 742) and IDeg (n = 727) switchers. Using fixed follow-up (ITT method), hypoglycaemia incidence decreased significantly from baseline with Gla-300 (all hypoglycaemia: 15.6% to 12.7%; P = .006; hypoglycaemia associated with inpatient/emergency department [ED] encounter: 5.3% to 3.5%; P = .007), but not with IDeg. After adjusting for baseline hypoglycaemia, no significant differences in hypoglycaemia incidence and event rate were found at follow-up (ITT) for Gla-300 vs IDeg. Using variable follow-up (OT), hypoglycaemia incidence was similar in both groups, but Gla-300 switchers had a lower inpatient/ED hypoglycaemia event rate at follow-up (adjusted rate ratio 0.56; P = .016).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>In a real-world setting, switching from Gla-100 or IDet to Gla-300 or IDeg was associated with similar improvements in glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia in adult patients with T2D.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Diabetes, obesity &amp; metabolism</journal><pagination>2148-2158</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6099352</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Clinical outcomes in real-world patients with type 2 diabetes switching from first- to second-generation basal insulin analogues: Comparative effectiveness of insulin glargine 300 units/mL and insulin degludec in the DELIVER D+ cohort study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6099352</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Preblick R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sullivan SD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Blonde L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhou FL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roussel R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bosnyak Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gupta RA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Westerbacka J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bailey TS</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Clinical outcomes in real-world patients with type 2 diabetes switching from first- to second-generation basal insulin analogues: Comparative effectiveness of insulin glargine 300 units/mL and insulin degludec in the DELIVER D+ cohort study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Aims&lt;/h4>To compare clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) switching from insulin glargine 100 units/mL (Gla-100) or insulin detemir (IDet) to insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) or insulin degludec (IDeg).&lt;h4>Materials and methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a retrospective, observational study of electronic medical records for Gla-300/IDeg adult switchers (March 1, 2015 to January 31, 2017) with active records for 12-month baseline (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] used a 6-month baseline period) and 6-month follow-up periods. Gla-300 and IDeg switchers were propensity score-matched using baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Outcomes were HbA1c change and goal attainment (among patients with HbA1c captured at follow-up), and hypoglycaemia with fixed follow-up (intention-to-treat [ITT]; 6 months) and variable follow-up (on-treatment [OT]; to discontinuation or 6 months).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Each matched cohort comprised 1592 patients. The mean decrease in HbA1c and HbA1c goal (&lt;7.0% [53 mmol/mol] and &lt;8.0% [64 mmol/mol]) attainment rates were similar for Gla-300 (n = 742) and IDeg (n = 727) switchers. Using fixed follow-up (ITT method), hypoglycaemia incidence decreased significantly from baseline with Gla-300 (all hypoglycaemia: 15.6% to 12.7%; P = .006; hypoglycaemia associated with inpatient/emergency department [ED] encounter: 5.3% to 3.5%; P = .007), but not with IDeg. After adjusting for baseline hypoglycaemia, no significant differences in hypoglycaemia incidence and event rate were found at follow-up (ITT) for Gla-300 vs IDeg. Using variable follow-up (OT), hypoglycaemia incidence was similar in both groups, but Gla-300 switchers had a lower inpatient/ED hypoglycaemia event rate at follow-up (adjusted rate ratio 0.56; P = .016).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>In a real-world setting, switching from Gla-100 or IDet to Gla-300 or IDeg was associated with similar improvements in glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia in adult patients with T2D.</description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018 Sep</publication><modification>2025-05-18T12:16:11.722Z</modification><creation>2025-05-18T12:16:11.722Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6099352</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29938887</pubmed><doi>10.1111/dom.13345</doi></cross_references></HashMap>