<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>3(3)</volume><submitter>Vargas CE</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Randomized evidence for extreme hypofractionation in prostate cancer is lacking. We aimed to identify differences in toxicity and quality-of-life outcomes between standard fractionation and extreme hypofractionated radiation in a phase 3 randomized trial.&lt;h4>Methods and materials&lt;/h4>We analyzed the results of the first 75 patients in our phase 3 trial, comparing 38 Gy relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) in 5 fractions (n = 46) versus 79.2 Gy RBE in 44 fractions (n = 29). Patients received proton radiation using fiducials and daily image guidance. We evaluated American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUASI), adverse events (AEs), and Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC) domains. The primary endpoint of this interim analysis was the cumulative incidence of grade </pubmed_abstract><journal>Advances in radiation oncology</journal><pagination>322-330</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6128091</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Initial toxicity, quality-of-life outcomes, and dosimetric impact in a randomized phase 3 trial of hypofractionated versus standard fractionated proton therapy for low-risk prostate cancer.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6128091</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Hartsell WF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chang JH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vargas CE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rodriquez R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Larson GL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Keole SR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schmidt MQ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Doh L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sinesi C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Niska JR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pankuch M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Initial toxicity, quality-of-life outcomes, and dosimetric impact in a randomized phase 3 trial of hypofractionated versus standard fractionated proton therapy for low-risk prostate cancer.</name><description>&lt;h4>Purpose&lt;/h4>Randomized evidence for extreme hypofractionation in prostate cancer is lacking. We aimed to identify differences in toxicity and quality-of-life outcomes between standard fractionation and extreme hypofractionated radiation in a phase 3 randomized trial.&lt;h4>Methods and materials&lt;/h4>We analyzed the results of the first 75 patients in our phase 3 trial, comparing 38 Gy relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) in 5 fractions (n = 46) versus 79.2 Gy RBE in 44 fractions (n = 29). Patients received proton radiation using fiducials and daily image guidance. We evaluated American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUASI), adverse events (AEs), and Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC) domains. The primary endpoint of this interim analysis was the cumulative incidence of grade </description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018 Jul-Sep</publication><modification>2025-04-19T14:24:35.423Z</modification><creation>2019-03-26T23:55:34Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6128091</accession><cross_references><pubmed>30202801</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.adro.2018.02.004</doi></cross_references></HashMap>