<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>22(3)</volume><submitter>Michel P</submitter><pubmed_abstract>The phytochemical profile and anti-inflammatory activity of Gaultheria procumbens dry lipophilic leaf extracts were evaluated. Forty compounds were identified by GC-MS, representing 86.36% and 81.97% of the petroleum ether (PE) and chloroform (CHE) extracts, respectively, with ursolic acid (28.82%), oleanolic acid (10.11%), methyl benzoate (10.03%), and methyl salicylate (6.88%) dominating in CHE, and methyl benzoate (21.59%), docosane (18.86%), and octacosane (11.72%) prevailing in PE. Three components of CHE were fully identified after flash chromatography isolation and spectroscopic studies as (6S,9R)-vomifoliol (4.35%), 8-demethyl-latifolin (1.13%), and 8-demethylsideroxylin (2.25%). Hyaluronidase and lipoxygenase inhibitory activity was tested for CHE (IC50 = 282.15 ± 10.38 ?g/mL and 899.97 ± 31.17 ?g/mL, respectively), PE (IC50 = 401.82 ± 16.12 ?g/mL and 738.49 ± 15.92 ?g/mL), and nine of the main constituents versus heparin (IC50 = 366.24 ± 14.72 ?g/mL) and indomethacin (IC50 = 92.60 ± 3.71 ?g/mL) as positive controls. With the best activity/concentration relationships, ursolic and oleanolic acids were recommended as analytical markers for the extracts and plant material. Seasonal variation of both markers following foliar development was investigated by UHPLC-PDA. The highest levels of ursolic (5.36-5.87 mg/g DW of the leaves) and oleanolic (1.14-1.26 mg/g DW) acids were observed between August and October, indicating the optimal season for harvesting.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)</journal><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6155426</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Metabolite Profiling of Eastern Teaberry (Gaultheria procumbens L.) Lipophilic Leaf Extracts with Hyaluronidase and Lipoxygenase Inhibitory Activity.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6155426</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Matczak M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kilanowicz A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wesolowski W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Olszewska MA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Owczarek A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mikiciuk-Olasik E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kosno M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Michel P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Szymanski P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Metabolite Profiling of Eastern Teaberry (Gaultheria procumbens L.) Lipophilic Leaf Extracts with Hyaluronidase and Lipoxygenase Inhibitory Activity.</name><description>The phytochemical profile and anti-inflammatory activity of Gaultheria procumbens dry lipophilic leaf extracts were evaluated. Forty compounds were identified by GC-MS, representing 86.36% and 81.97% of the petroleum ether (PE) and chloroform (CHE) extracts, respectively, with ursolic acid (28.82%), oleanolic acid (10.11%), methyl benzoate (10.03%), and methyl salicylate (6.88%) dominating in CHE, and methyl benzoate (21.59%), docosane (18.86%), and octacosane (11.72%) prevailing in PE. Three components of CHE were fully identified after flash chromatography isolation and spectroscopic studies as (6S,9R)-vomifoliol (4.35%), 8-demethyl-latifolin (1.13%), and 8-demethylsideroxylin (2.25%). Hyaluronidase and lipoxygenase inhibitory activity was tested for CHE (IC50 = 282.15 ± 10.38 ?g/mL and 899.97 ± 31.17 ?g/mL, respectively), PE (IC50 = 401.82 ± 16.12 ?g/mL and 738.49 ± 15.92 ?g/mL), and nine of the main constituents versus heparin (IC50 = 366.24 ± 14.72 ?g/mL) and indomethacin (IC50 = 92.60 ± 3.71 ?g/mL) as positive controls. With the best activity/concentration relationships, ursolic and oleanolic acids were recommended as analytical markers for the extracts and plant material. Seasonal variation of both markers following foliar development was investigated by UHPLC-PDA. The highest levels of ursolic (5.36-5.87 mg/g DW of the leaves) and oleanolic (1.14-1.26 mg/g DW) acids were observed between August and October, indicating the optimal season for harvesting.</description><dates><release>2017-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2017 Mar</publication><modification>2021-02-21T06:17:06Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T00:06:47Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6155426</accession><cross_references><pubmed>28272321</pubmed><doi>10.3390/molecules22030412</doi></cross_references></HashMap>