<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>52(3)</volume><submitter>Sands SA</submitter><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><pubmed_abstract>A possible precision-medicine approach to treating obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) involves targeting ventilatory instability (elevated loop gain) using supplemental inspired oxygen in selected patients. Here we test whether elevated loop gain and three key endophenotypic traits (collapsibility, compensation and arousability), quantified using clinical polysomnography, can predict the effect of supplemental oxygen on OSA severity.36 patients (apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) >20?events·h-1) completed two overnight polysomnographic studies (single-blinded randomised-controlled crossover) on supplemental oxygen (40% inspired) versus sham (air). OSA traits were quantified from the air-night polysomnography. Responders were defined by a ?50% reduction in AHI (supine non-rapid eye movement). Secondary outcomes included blood pressure and self-reported sleep quality.Nine of 36 patients (25%) responded to supplemental oxygen (?AHI=72±5%). Elevated loop gain was not a significant univariate predictor of responder/non-responder status (primary analysis). In post hoc analysis, a logistic regression model based on elevated loop gain and other traits (better collapsibility and compensation; cross-validated) had 83% accuracy (89% before cross-validation); predicted responders exhibited an improvement in OSA severity (?AHI 59±6% versus 12±7% in predicted non-responders, p=0.0001) plus lowered morning blood pressure and "better" self-reported sleep.Patients whose OSA responds to supplemental oxygen can be identified by measuring their endophenotypic traits using diagnostic polysomnography.</pubmed_abstract><journal>The European respiratory journal</journal><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6232193</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Identifying obstructive sleep apnoea patients responsive to supplemental oxygen therapy.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6232193</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R21 HL121794</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR001102</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL119201</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P01 HL094307</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 HL134632</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>P01 HL095491</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL128658</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL081823</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL102321</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL085188</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K24 HL132105</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Butler JP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Melo CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Taranto-Montemurro L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Owens RL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smales ET</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Malhotra A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Edwards BA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>White DP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Azarbarzin A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Terrill PI</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sands SA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hess LB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marques M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wellman A</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Identifying obstructive sleep apnoea patients responsive to supplemental oxygen therapy.</name><description>A possible precision-medicine approach to treating obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) involves targeting ventilatory instability (elevated loop gain) using supplemental inspired oxygen in selected patients. Here we test whether elevated loop gain and three key endophenotypic traits (collapsibility, compensation and arousability), quantified using clinical polysomnography, can predict the effect of supplemental oxygen on OSA severity.36 patients (apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) >20?events·h-1) completed two overnight polysomnographic studies (single-blinded randomised-controlled crossover) on supplemental oxygen (40% inspired) versus sham (air). OSA traits were quantified from the air-night polysomnography. Responders were defined by a ?50% reduction in AHI (supine non-rapid eye movement). Secondary outcomes included blood pressure and self-reported sleep quality.Nine of 36 patients (25%) responded to supplemental oxygen (?AHI=72±5%). Elevated loop gain was not a significant univariate predictor of responder/non-responder status (primary analysis). In post hoc analysis, a logistic regression model based on elevated loop gain and other traits (better collapsibility and compensation; cross-validated) had 83% accuracy (89% before cross-validation); predicted responders exhibited an improvement in OSA severity (?AHI 59±6% versus 12±7% in predicted non-responders, p=0.0001) plus lowered morning blood pressure and "better" self-reported sleep.Patients whose OSA responds to supplemental oxygen can be identified by measuring their endophenotypic traits using diagnostic polysomnography.</description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018 Sep</publication><modification>2020-11-19T08:39:56Z</modification><creation>2019-06-06T20:27:15Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6232193</accession><cross_references><pubmed>30139771</pubmed><doi>10.1183/13993003.00674-2018</doi></cross_references></HashMap>