<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Hutton EK</submitter><funding>Canadian Institutes of Health Research</funding><pagination>1682-1690</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6282843</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>125(13)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Does planned caesarean compared with planned vaginal birth lower the risk of problematic urinary stress, faecal, or flatal incontinence?&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Women between 32&lt;sup>0/7&lt;/sup> and 38&lt;sup>6/7&lt;/sup> weeks of gestation with a twin pregnancy were randomised to planned caesarean or planned vaginal birth.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>The trial took place at 106 centres in 25 countries.&lt;h4>Population&lt;/h4>A total of 2305 of the 2804 women enrolled in the study completed questionnaires at 2 years (82.2% follow-up): 1155 in the planned caesarean group and 1150 in the planned vaginal birth group.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A structured self-administered questionnaire completed at 2 years postpartum.&lt;h4>Main outcome measures&lt;/h4>The primary maternal outcome of the Twin Birth Study was problematic urinary stress, or fecal, or flatal incontinence at 2 years RESULTS: Women in the planned caesarean group had lower problematic urinary stress incontinence rates compared with women in the planned vaginal birth group [93/1147 (8.11%) versus 140/1143 (12.25%); odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.83; P = 0.001]. Among those with problematic urinary stress incontinence, quality of life (measured using the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire, IIQ-7) was not different for planned caesarean versus planned vaginal birth groups [mean (SD): 18.4 (21.0) versus 19.1 (21.5); P = 0.82]. There were no differences in problematic faecal or flatal incontinence, or in other maternal outcomes.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Among women with a twin pregnancy and no prior history of urinary stress incontinence, a management strategy of planned caesarean compared with planned vaginal birth reduces the risk of problematic urinary stress incontinence at 2 years postpartum. Our findings show that the prevalence but not the severity of urinary stress incontinence was associated with mode of birth.&lt;h4>Funding&lt;/h4>Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (grant no. MCT-63164).&lt;h4>Tweetable abstract&lt;/h4>For women with twins, planned caesarean compared with planned vaginal birth is associated with decreased prevalence but not severity of urinary stress incontinence at 2 years.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</journal><pubmed_title>Urinary stress incontinence and other maternal outcomes 2 years after caesarean or vaginal birth for twin pregnancy: a multicentre randomised trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6282843</pmcid><funding_grant_id>MCT‐63164</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MCT-63164</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Willan AR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Twin Birth Study Collaborative Group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sanchez JJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hannah ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Allen AC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hutton EK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mangoff K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ohlsson A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ross S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Armson BA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Joseph KS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gafni A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Asztalos EV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Barrett J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Urinary stress incontinence and other maternal outcomes 2 years after caesarean or vaginal birth for twin pregnancy: a multicentre randomised trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Does planned caesarean compared with planned vaginal birth lower the risk of problematic urinary stress, faecal, or flatal incontinence?&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Women between 32&lt;sup>0/7&lt;/sup> and 38&lt;sup>6/7&lt;/sup> weeks of gestation with a twin pregnancy were randomised to planned caesarean or planned vaginal birth.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>The trial took place at 106 centres in 25 countries.&lt;h4>Population&lt;/h4>A total of 2305 of the 2804 women enrolled in the study completed questionnaires at 2 years (82.2% follow-up): 1155 in the planned caesarean group and 1150 in the planned vaginal birth group.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A structured self-administered questionnaire completed at 2 years postpartum.&lt;h4>Main outcome measures&lt;/h4>The primary maternal outcome of the Twin Birth Study was problematic urinary stress, or fecal, or flatal incontinence at 2 years RESULTS: Women in the planned caesarean group had lower problematic urinary stress incontinence rates compared with women in the planned vaginal birth group [93/1147 (8.11%) versus 140/1143 (12.25%); odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.83; P = 0.001]. Among those with problematic urinary stress incontinence, quality of life (measured using the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire, IIQ-7) was not different for planned caesarean versus planned vaginal birth groups [mean (SD): 18.4 (21.0) versus 19.1 (21.5); P = 0.82]. There were no differences in problematic faecal or flatal incontinence, or in other maternal outcomes.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Among women with a twin pregnancy and no prior history of urinary stress incontinence, a management strategy of planned caesarean compared with planned vaginal birth reduces the risk of problematic urinary stress incontinence at 2 years postpartum. Our findings show that the prevalence but not the severity of urinary stress incontinence was associated with mode of birth.&lt;h4>Funding&lt;/h4>Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) (grant no. MCT-63164).&lt;h4>Tweetable abstract&lt;/h4>For women with twins, planned caesarean compared with planned vaginal birth is associated with decreased prevalence but not severity of urinary stress incontinence at 2 years.</description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018 Dec</publication><modification>2026-07-09T11:26:49.062Z</modification><creation>2019-03-27T00:11:17Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6282843</accession><cross_references><pubmed>30007113</pubmed><doi>10.1111/1471-0528.15407</doi></cross_references></HashMap>