<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Hsiao B</submitter><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>Rheumatology Research Foundation Innovative Research</funding><funding>NIAMS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>629-637</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6310675</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>71(5)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>In this proof-of-concept study, we sought to evaluate whether a value clarification tool enabling patients to view a set of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment preference phenotypes could be used to support shared decision-making at the point-of-care.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a pretest/post test study. English-speaking patients with RA presenting to their scheduled outpatient visits were asked to participate. Visits for patients with active RA were transcribed. Shared decision-making components were measured using a quantitative coding scheme based on an established model of shared decision-making.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Forty-six visits were included in the pretest and 40 in the post test phases. Providers offered more disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (2 or more) in the post test visits (60%) compared to the pretest visits (47.8%). Overall, more patients vocalized their values and/or preferences in the post test visits compared to the pretest visits for treatment escalation decisions including a choice of 1 new DMARD (90.9% versus 56.3%), 2 or more new DMARDs (95.8% versus 86.4%), as well as prednisone (87.5% versus 66.7%). Providers were also more likely to base their recommendations on patients' values and/or preferences in the post test (100% of 6 visits) than the pretest (64.3% of 14 visits) phases during visits in which a recommendation was made. The mean ± SD length of the visit was 29.9 ± 11.6 minutes and 25.1 ± 10.7 minutes in the pretest and post test phases, respectively.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>This study provides an early indication that a value clarification tool allowing patients to consider a set of preference phenotypes can support shared decision-making at the point-of-care without extending visit time.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Arthritis care &amp; research</journal><pubmed_title>Preference Phenotypes in Support of Shared Decision-Making at Point-of-Care for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Proof-of-Concept Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6310675</pmcid><funding_grant_id>K24 AR060231</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR001863</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>T32 AR007107</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Binder-Finnema P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nowell WB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wiedmeyer C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hsiao B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Michel G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fraenkel L</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Preference Phenotypes in Support of Shared Decision-Making at Point-of-Care for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Proof-of-Concept Study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>In this proof-of-concept study, we sought to evaluate whether a value clarification tool enabling patients to view a set of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment preference phenotypes could be used to support shared decision-making at the point-of-care.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We conducted a pretest/post test study. English-speaking patients with RA presenting to their scheduled outpatient visits were asked to participate. Visits for patients with active RA were transcribed. Shared decision-making components were measured using a quantitative coding scheme based on an established model of shared decision-making.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Forty-six visits were included in the pretest and 40 in the post test phases. Providers offered more disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (2 or more) in the post test visits (60%) compared to the pretest visits (47.8%). Overall, more patients vocalized their values and/or preferences in the post test visits compared to the pretest visits for treatment escalation decisions including a choice of 1 new DMARD (90.9% versus 56.3%), 2 or more new DMARDs (95.8% versus 86.4%), as well as prednisone (87.5% versus 66.7%). Providers were also more likely to base their recommendations on patients' values and/or preferences in the post test (100% of 6 visits) than the pretest (64.3% of 14 visits) phases during visits in which a recommendation was made. The mean ± SD length of the visit was 29.9 ± 11.6 minutes and 25.1 ± 10.7 minutes in the pretest and post test phases, respectively.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>This study provides an early indication that a value clarification tool allowing patients to consider a set of preference phenotypes can support shared decision-making at the point-of-care without extending visit time.</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 May</publication><modification>2021-02-20T17:48:05Z</modification><creation>2020-10-29T11:54:25Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6310675</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29953733</pubmed><doi>10.1002/acr.23684</doi></cross_references></HashMap>