{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Schick-Makaroff K"],"funding":["Kidney Foundation of Canada"],"pagination":["20"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6330465"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["8(1)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Background</h4>Patient-reported outcomes and experience measures (jointly referred to here as PROs) are internationally recognized as a means for patients to provide information about their quality of life, symptoms, and experiences with care. Although increasingly recognized as key to improving the quality of healthcare at individual (e.g., patients, caregivers, and providers) and aggregate (e.g., government, policy/system-wide decision-making) levels, there are important knowledge gaps in our understanding of how PROs are, and can be, used across different settings, particularly in nephrology to enhance person-centered care. This knowledge is needed for developing strategies to guide optimal use of PROs in nephrology care. Currently, no strategies exist. The purpose of this review is"],"journal":["Systematic reviews"],"pubmed_title":["Strategies for incorporating patient-reported outcomes in the care of people with chronic kidney disease (PRO kidney): a protocol for a realist synthesis."],"pmcid":["PMC6330465"],"funding_grant_id":["KFOC 160024"],"pubmed_authors":["Thompson S","Flynn R","Klarenbach S","Karimi-Dehkordi M","Greenhalgh J","Schick-Makaroff K","Thummapol O","Sawatzky R"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Strategies for incorporating patient-reported outcomes in the care of people with chronic kidney disease (PRO kidney): a protocol for a realist synthesis.","description":"<h4>Background</h4>Patient-reported outcomes and experience measures (jointly referred to here as PROs) are internationally recognized as a means for patients to provide information about their quality of life, symptoms, and experiences with care. Although increasingly recognized as key to improving the quality of healthcare at individual (e.g., patients, caregivers, and providers) and aggregate (e.g., government, policy/system-wide decision-making) levels, there are important knowledge gaps in our understanding of how PROs are, and can be, used across different settings, particularly in nephrology to enhance person-centered care. This knowledge is needed for developing strategies to guide optimal use of PROs in nephrology care. Currently, no strategies exist. The purpose of this review is","dates":{"release":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2019 Jan","modification":"2025-04-25T17:36:04.956Z","creation":"2019-03-26T22:37:55Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC6330465","cross_references":{"pubmed":["30636637"],"doi":["10.1186/s13643-018-0911-6"]}}