<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Januszewicz W</submitter><funding>Cancer Research UK</funding><funding>NIDDK NIH HHS</funding><funding>Medical Research Council</funding><funding>National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>647-656.e1</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6370042</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>17(4)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background &amp; aims&lt;/h4>Diagnosis and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) have become emerging public health issues. Cytosponge is a novel, minimally invasive esophageal cell collection device. We aimed to assess the data on safety and acceptability of this device.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We performed a patient-level review of 5 prospective trials assessing Cytosponge performance in patients with reflux disease, BE and EoE in primary and secondary care. Acceptability of Cytosponge and subsequent endoscopy were recorded with visual analogue scale (VAS), wherein 0 and 10 denoted lowest and highest acceptability. Median VAS scores were compared using a Mann-Whitney test. The number of attempts, failures in swallowing the device and occurrence of adverse events</pubmed_abstract><journal>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association</journal><pubmed_title>Safety and Acceptability of Esophageal Cytosponge Cell Collection Device in a Pooled Analysis of Data From Individual Patients.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6370042</pmcid><funding_grant_id>ACF-2016-12-001</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>12088</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K24 DK100548</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>ACF-2017-14-003</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U54 CA163060</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>A12088</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MC_UU_12022/2</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>BEST1 and BEST2 study investigators</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lehovsky K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>di Pietro M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Januszewicz W</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nuckcheddy T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dellon ES</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tan WK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boussioutas A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kadri S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shaheen NJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Katzka DA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moist S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Debiram-Beecham I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fitzgerald RC</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Safety and Acceptability of Esophageal Cytosponge Cell Collection Device in a Pooled Analysis of Data From Individual Patients.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background &amp; aims&lt;/h4>Diagnosis and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) have become emerging public health issues. Cytosponge is a novel, minimally invasive esophageal cell collection device. We aimed to assess the data on safety and acceptability of this device.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We performed a patient-level review of 5 prospective trials assessing Cytosponge performance in patients with reflux disease, BE and EoE in primary and secondary care. Acceptability of Cytosponge and subsequent endoscopy were recorded with visual analogue scale (VAS), wherein 0 and 10 denoted lowest and highest acceptability. Median VAS scores were compared using a Mann-Whitney test. The number of attempts, failures in swallowing the device and occurrence of adverse events</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Mar</publication><modification>2026-05-05T06:40:27.907Z</modification><creation>2019-06-06T20:51:06Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6370042</accession><cross_references><pubmed>30099104</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.043</doi></cross_references></HashMap>