{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["33(2)"],"submitter":["Heines SJH"],"pubmed_abstract":["To report on our clinical experience using EIT in individualized PEEP titration in ARDS. Using EIT assessment, we optimized PEEP settings in 39 ARDS patients. The EIT PEEP settings were compared with the physicians' PEEP settings and the PEEP settings according to the ARDS network. We defined a PEEP difference equal to or greater than 4 cm H<sub>2</sub>O as clinically relevant. Changes in lung compliance and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>-ratio were compared in patients with EIT-based PEEP adjustments and in patients with unaltered PEEP. In 28% of the patients, the difference in EIT-based PEEP and physician-PEEP was clinically relevant; in 36%, EIT-based PEEP and physician-PEEP were equal. The EIT-based PEEP disagreed with the PEEP settings according to the ARDS network. Adjusting PEEP ba"],"journal":["Journal of clinical monitoring and computing"],"pagination":["291-300"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6420412"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Clinical implementation of electric impedance tomography in the treatment of ARDS: a single centre experience."],"pmcid":["PMC6420412"],"pubmed_authors":["Bergmans DCJJ","Strauch U","van de Poll MCG","Roekaerts PMHJ","Heines SJH"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Clinical implementation of electric impedance tomography in the treatment of ARDS: a single centre experience.","description":"To report on our clinical experience using EIT in individualized PEEP titration in ARDS. Using EIT assessment, we optimized PEEP settings in 39 ARDS patients. The EIT PEEP settings were compared with the physicians' PEEP settings and the PEEP settings according to the ARDS network. We defined a PEEP difference equal to or greater than 4 cm H<sub>2</sub>O as clinically relevant. Changes in lung compliance and PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>-ratio were compared in patients with EIT-based PEEP adjustments and in patients with unaltered PEEP. In 28% of the patients, the difference in EIT-based PEEP and physician-PEEP was clinically relevant; in 36%, EIT-based PEEP and physician-PEEP were equal. The EIT-based PEEP disagreed with the PEEP settings according to the ARDS network. Adjusting PEEP ba","dates":{"release":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2019 Apr","modification":"2025-06-01T01:18:40.253Z","creation":"2025-06-01T01:18:40.253Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC6420412","cross_references":{"pubmed":["29845479"],"doi":["10.1007/s10877-018-0164-x"]}}