<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(3)</volume><submitter>Pathirana T</submitter><funding>National Health and Medical Research Council</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To quantify the risk of overdiagnosis associated with prostate cancer screening in Australia using a novel lifetime risk approach.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Modelling and validation of the lifetime risk method using publicly available population data.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Opportunistic screening for prostate cancer in the Australian population.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Australian male population (1982-2012).&lt;h4>Interventions&lt;/h4>Prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer screening.&lt;h4>Primary and secondary outcome measures&lt;/h4>Primary: lifetime risk of overdiagnosis in 2012 (excess lifetime cancer risk adjusted for changing competing mortality); Secondary: lifetime risk of prostate cancer diagnosis (unadjusted and adjusted for competing mortality); Excess lifetime risk of prostate cancer diagnosis (for all years subsequent to 1982).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The lifetime risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer increased from 6.1% in 1982 (1 in 17) to 19.6% in 2012 (1 in 5). Using 2012 competing mortality rates, the lifetime risk in 1982 was 11.5% (95% CI 11.0% to 12.0%). The excess lifetime risk of prostate cancer in 2012 (adjusted for changing competing mortality) was 8.2% (95% CI 7.6% to 8.7%) (1 in 13). This corresponds to 41% of prostate cancers being overdiagnosed.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Our estimated rate of overdiagnosis is in agreement with estimates using other methods. This method may be used without the need to adjust for lead times. If annual (cross-sectional) data are used, then it may give valid estimates of overdiagnosis once screening has been established long enough for the benefits from the early detection of non-overdiagnosed cancer at a younger age to be realised in older age groups.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open</journal><pagination>e022457</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6429722</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Lifetime risk of prostate cancer overdiagnosis in Australia: quantifying the risk of overdiagnosis associated with prostate cancer screening in Australia using a novel lifetime risk approach.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6429722</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Pathirana T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hayen A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Glasziou P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Doust J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bell K</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Lifetime risk of prostate cancer overdiagnosis in Australia: quantifying the risk of overdiagnosis associated with prostate cancer screening in Australia using a novel lifetime risk approach.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To quantify the risk of overdiagnosis associated with prostate cancer screening in Australia using a novel lifetime risk approach.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Modelling and validation of the lifetime risk method using publicly available population data.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Opportunistic screening for prostate cancer in the Australian population.&lt;h4>Participants&lt;/h4>Australian male population (1982-2012).&lt;h4>Interventions&lt;/h4>Prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer screening.&lt;h4>Primary and secondary outcome measures&lt;/h4>Primary: lifetime risk of overdiagnosis in 2012 (excess lifetime cancer risk adjusted for changing competing mortality); Secondary: lifetime risk of prostate cancer diagnosis (unadjusted and adjusted for competing mortality); Excess lifetime risk of prostate cancer diagnosis (for all years subsequent to 1982).&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The lifetime risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer increased from 6.1% in 1982 (1 in 17) to 19.6% in 2012 (1 in 5). Using 2012 competing mortality rates, the lifetime risk in 1982 was 11.5% (95% CI 11.0% to 12.0%). The excess lifetime risk of prostate cancer in 2012 (adjusted for changing competing mortality) was 8.2% (95% CI 7.6% to 8.7%) (1 in 13). This corresponds to 41% of prostate cancers being overdiagnosed.&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Our estimated rate of overdiagnosis is in agreement with estimates using other methods. This method may be used without the need to adjust for lead times. If annual (cross-sectional) data are used, then it may give valid estimates of overdiagnosis once screening has been established long enough for the benefits from the early detection of non-overdiagnosed cancer at a younger age to be realised in older age groups.</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Mar</publication><modification>2024-11-12T01:18:51.272Z</modification><creation>2019-08-04T07:37:58Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6429722</accession><cross_references><pubmed>30858156</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022457</doi></cross_references></HashMap>