{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["23(4)"],"submitter":["Mydam J"],"pubmed_abstract":["Objectives To explore associations between race, nativity, and low birth weight (LBW) among Latina and non-Latina women, with special attention to the Black Latina subgroup. Methods Using US natality data from 2011 to 2013, we designed a population-based study to compare LBW (< 2500 g) rates across six groups of women with self-identified race (N = 7,865,264)-White and Black Latina, foreign-born and US-born; non-Latina Black; and non-Latina White-creating 4 models for analysis: unadjusted (Model 1) and adjusted for sociodemographic factors (Model 2), sociodemographic plus medical risk factors (Model 3), and Model 3 factors plus smoking (Model 4). Results Infant LBW rate for Black Latinas (7.9%) was higher than White Latinas (5.6%) and varied by nativity: US-born (8.9%) versus foreign-born (6.1%). Among all study groups, US-born Black Latinas' LBW rate (8.9%) was second only to non-Latina Blacks (11.0%). In unadjusted Model 1, US-born Black Latinas had 81% (odds ratio [OR]: 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.74-1.88) and foreign-born Black Latinas had 22% (OR: 1.22; 95% CI 1.15-1.29) higher odds of LBW than non-Latina White women (reference group). However, in Model 2, ORs for foreign-born Black Latinas were nearly identical to non-Latina Whites (OR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.97-1.1), while US-born Black Latinas' odds were still 47% higher (OR: 1.47; 95% CI 1.42-1.53). Model 3 ORs for each group were similar to Model 2. Conclusions for Practice A significant subgroup of Latina women self-identify as Black, and their LBW rates are higher than White Latinas. Black Latinas born in the United States fare worse than their foreign-born counterparts, implicating negative effects of Black race specific to the US context."],"journal":["Maternal and child health journal"],"pagination":["538-546"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6439288"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"pubmed_title":["Low Birth Weight Among Infants Born to Black Latina Women in the United States."],"pmcid":["PMC6439288"],"pubmed_authors":["Mydam J","David RJ","Rankin KM","Collins JW"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Low Birth Weight Among Infants Born to Black Latina Women in the United States.","description":"Objectives To explore associations between race, nativity, and low birth weight (LBW) among Latina and non-Latina women, with special attention to the Black Latina subgroup. Methods Using US natality data from 2011 to 2013, we designed a population-based study to compare LBW (< 2500 g) rates across six groups of women with self-identified race (N = 7,865,264)-White and Black Latina, foreign-born and US-born; non-Latina Black; and non-Latina White-creating 4 models for analysis: unadjusted (Model 1) and adjusted for sociodemographic factors (Model 2), sociodemographic plus medical risk factors (Model 3), and Model 3 factors plus smoking (Model 4). Results Infant LBW rate for Black Latinas (7.9%) was higher than White Latinas (5.6%) and varied by nativity: US-born (8.9%) versus foreign-born (6.1%). Among all study groups, US-born Black Latinas' LBW rate (8.9%) was second only to non-Latina Blacks (11.0%). In unadjusted Model 1, US-born Black Latinas had 81% (odds ratio [OR]: 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.74-1.88) and foreign-born Black Latinas had 22% (OR: 1.22; 95% CI 1.15-1.29) higher odds of LBW than non-Latina White women (reference group). However, in Model 2, ORs for foreign-born Black Latinas were nearly identical to non-Latina Whites (OR: 1.03; 95% CI 0.97-1.1), while US-born Black Latinas' odds were still 47% higher (OR: 1.47; 95% CI 1.42-1.53). Model 3 ORs for each group were similar to Model 2. Conclusions for Practice A significant subgroup of Latina women self-identify as Black, and their LBW rates are higher than White Latinas. Black Latinas born in the United States fare worse than their foreign-born counterparts, implicating negative effects of Black race specific to the US context.","dates":{"release":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2019 Apr","modification":"2025-04-06T16:50:59.009Z","creation":"2019-06-06T21:03:46Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC6439288","cross_references":{"pubmed":["30604106"],"doi":["10.1007/s10995-018-2669-9"]}}