<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores><citationCount>0</citationCount><reanalysisCount>0</reanalysisCount><viewCount>53</viewCount><searchCount>0</searchCount></scores><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>26(6)</volume><submitter>Kano M</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Postoperative docetaxel plus S-1 (DS) chemotherapy is expected to be the standard therapeutic strategy for pStage III gastric cancer based on the results of the JACCRO GC-07 study. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is thought to have several advantages over adjuvant settings.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This study aimed to compare the efficacies of NAC DS and the surgery-first strategy for advanced gastric cancer patients with D2 gastrectomy.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This was a retrospective, single-institution observational study. Of 171 patients with locally advanced (cStage IIB or III) gastric cancer who underwent curative D2 gastrectomy and received NAC DS and/or S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy between 2011 and 2017, 76 (after propensity score matching for 132 patients who met the eligibility criteria) were enrolled in this study. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was used to directly compare efficacies between NAC DS patients and surgery-first patients.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The 3-year PFS rates for the NAC DS group were significantly higher than those for the surgery-first group (80.0 vs. 58.7; p = 0.037), and the progression hazard ratio of the NAC DS group compared with the surgery-first group was 0.394 (95% confidence interval 0.159-0.978; p = 0.045).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>The NAC DS group showed a high 3-year PFS compared with the surgery-first group, with standard S-1 postoperative chemotherapy or observation. NAC DS can be expected to be beneficial as the standard therapy for advanced gastric cancer and should be adopted for the test arm of a randomized controlled phase III trial.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Annals of surgical oncology</journal><pagination>1805-1813</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6510880</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Survival Benefit of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with S-1 Plus Docetaxel for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6510880</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Ota S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kano M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hanari N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Murakami K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hayashi H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Uesato M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gunji H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Toyozumi T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hayano K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matsubara H</pubmed_authors><view_count>53</view_count></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Survival Benefit of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with S-1 Plus Docetaxel for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Postoperative docetaxel plus S-1 (DS) chemotherapy is expected to be the standard therapeutic strategy for pStage III gastric cancer based on the results of the JACCRO GC-07 study. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is thought to have several advantages over adjuvant settings.&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>This study aimed to compare the efficacies of NAC DS and the surgery-first strategy for advanced gastric cancer patients with D2 gastrectomy.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>This was a retrospective, single-institution observational study. Of 171 patients with locally advanced (cStage IIB or III) gastric cancer who underwent curative D2 gastrectomy and received NAC DS and/or S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy between 2011 and 2017, 76 (after propensity score matching for 132 patients who met the eligibility criteria) were enrolled in this study. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was used to directly compare efficacies between NAC DS patients and surgery-first patients.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The 3-year PFS rates for the NAC DS group were significantly higher than those for the surgery-first group (80.0 vs. 58.7; p = 0.037), and the progression hazard ratio of the NAC DS group compared with the surgery-first group was 0.394 (95% confidence interval 0.159-0.978; p = 0.045).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>The NAC DS group showed a high 3-year PFS compared with the surgery-first group, with standard S-1 postoperative chemotherapy or observation. NAC DS can be expected to be beneficial as the standard therapy for advanced gastric cancer and should be adopted for the test arm of a randomized controlled phase III trial.</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Jun</publication><modification>2024-02-15T23:22:05.465Z</modification><creation>2019-06-06T23:13:35Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6510880</accession><cross_references><pubmed>30977014</pubmed><doi>10.1245/s10434-019-07299-7</doi></cross_references></HashMap>