<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Strom JB</submitter><funding>National, Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute</funding><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>American Heart Association-American Stroke Association</funding><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>64-71</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6535119</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>212</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Randomized controlled trials are the "gold standard" for comparing the safety and efficacy of therapies but may be limited due to high costs, lack of feasibility, and difficulty enrolling "real-world" patient populations. The Extending Trial-Based Evaluations of Medical Therapies Using Novel Sources of Data (EXTEND) Study seeks to evaluate whether data collected within procedural registries and claims databases can reproduce trial results by substituting surrogate non-trial-based variables for exposures and outcomes.&lt;h4>Methods and results&lt;/h4>Patient-level data from 2 clinical trial programs-the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Study and the United States CoreValve Studies-will be linked to a combination of national registry, administrative claims, and health system data. The </pubmed_abstract><journal>American heart journal</journal><pubmed_title>Validating the use of registries and claims data to support randomized trials: Rationale and design of the Extending Trial-Based Evaluations of Medical Therapies Using Novel Sources of Data (EXTEND) Study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6535119</pmcid><funding_grant_id>K23 HL144907</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K24 HL150321</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL136708</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>1R01HL136708-01</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR001863</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>18CDA34110267</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Strom JB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Popma JJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yeh RW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mauri L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brennan JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Shen C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Valsdottir LR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tamez H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Curtis J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhao Y</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Validating the use of registries and claims data to support randomized trials: Rationale and design of the Extending Trial-Based Evaluations of Medical Therapies Using Novel Sources of Data (EXTEND) Study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Randomized controlled trials are the "gold standard" for comparing the safety and efficacy of therapies but may be limited due to high costs, lack of feasibility, and difficulty enrolling "real-world" patient populations. The Extending Trial-Based Evaluations of Medical Therapies Using Novel Sources of Data (EXTEND) Study seeks to evaluate whether data collected within procedural registries and claims databases can reproduce trial results by substituting surrogate non-trial-based variables for exposures and outcomes.&lt;h4>Methods and results&lt;/h4>Patient-level data from 2 clinical trial programs-the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Study and the United States CoreValve Studies-will be linked to a combination of national registry, administrative claims, and health system data. The </description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Jun</publication><modification>2025-04-18T22:08:19.886Z</modification><creation>2020-06-04T07:05:44Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6535119</accession><cross_references><pubmed>30953936</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.ahj.2019.02.007</doi></cross_references></HashMap>