<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(5)</volume><submitter>Rutegard M</submitter><funding>County Council of Västerbotten</funding><funding>Swedish Society for Colon and Rectal Surgeons</funding><funding>Svenska Läkaresällskapet</funding><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Different surgical techniques are used to cover the defect in the floor of the lesser pelvis after an 'extralevator' or 'extended' abdominoperineal excision for advanced rectal cancer. However, these operations are potentially mutilating, and the reconstruction method of the pelvic floor has been studied only sparsely. We aim to study whether a porcine-collagen implant is superior or equally beneficial to a gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap as a reconstruction method.&lt;h4>Methods and analysis&lt;/h4>This is a multicentre non-blinded randomised controlled trial with the experimental arm using a porcine-collagen implant and the control arm using a gluteus maximus muscle and skin rotation flap. Considered for inclusion are patients with rectal cancer, who are operated on with</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open</journal><pagination>e027255</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6549677</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Multicentre, randomised trial comparing acellular porcine collagen implant versus gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of the pelvic floor after extended abdominoperineal excision of rectum: study protocol for the Nordic Extended Abdominoperineal Excision (NEAPE) study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6549677</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Rutegard J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haapamaki MM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rutegard M</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Multicentre, randomised trial comparing acellular porcine collagen implant versus gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of the pelvic floor after extended abdominoperineal excision of rectum: study protocol for the Nordic Extended Abdominoperineal Excision (NEAPE) study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Different surgical techniques are used to cover the defect in the floor of the lesser pelvis after an 'extralevator' or 'extended' abdominoperineal excision for advanced rectal cancer. However, these operations are potentially mutilating, and the reconstruction method of the pelvic floor has been studied only sparsely. We aim to study whether a porcine-collagen implant is superior or equally beneficial to a gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap as a reconstruction method.&lt;h4>Methods and analysis&lt;/h4>This is a multicentre non-blinded randomised controlled trial with the experimental arm using a porcine-collagen implant and the control arm using a gluteus maximus muscle and skin rotation flap. Considered for inclusion are patients with rectal cancer, who are operated on with</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 May</publication><modification>2026-05-07T04:28:55.474Z</modification><creation>2019-07-24T07:10:16Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6549677</accession><cross_references><pubmed>31147361</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027255</doi></cross_references></HashMap>