<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>43</volume><submitter>Scholl S</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>There is a lack of information as to which molecular processes, present at diagnosis, favor tumour escape from standard-of-care treatments in cervical cancer (CC). RAIDs consortium (www.raids-fp7.eu), conducted a prospectively monitored trial, [BioRAIDs (NCT02428842)] with the objectives to generate high quality samples and molecular assessments to stratify patient populations and to identify molecular patterns associated with poor outcome.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Between 2013 and 2017, RAIDs collected a prospective CC sample and clinical dataset involving 419 participant patients from 18 centers in seven EU countries. Next Generation Sequencing has so far been carried out on a total of 182 samples from 377 evaluable (48%) patients, allowing to define dominant genetic alterations</pubmed_abstract><journal>EBioMedicine</journal><pagination>253-260</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6562019</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Clinical and genetic landscape of treatment naive cervical cancer: Alterations in PIK3CA and in epigenetic modulators associated with sub-optimal outcome.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6562019</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Samet N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Morice P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Campo ERD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Deutsch E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hupe P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kereszt A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Balint B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zijlmans H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jordanova E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dema A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kerr C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fabbro M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ngo C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dema S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gestraud P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koprivsek K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Servant N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guyon F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hillemanns P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lecuru F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Feron JG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Berns E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Coutant C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kenter G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de la Rochefordiere A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Floquet A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Minsat M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Savignoni A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dureau S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Popovic M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gleeson N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garbay D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nagy I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fourchotte V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Classe JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Margan M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Craina M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Colombo PE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mesgouez-Nebout N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kamal M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rouzier R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Djuran B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Marchal F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Saint-Jorre N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Malenkovic G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wimberger P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fumoleau P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de Koning L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Scholl S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mandic A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Samuels S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Girard E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>von der Leyen H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dubot C</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Clinical and genetic landscape of treatment naive cervical cancer: Alterations in PIK3CA and in epigenetic modulators associated with sub-optimal outcome.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>There is a lack of information as to which molecular processes, present at diagnosis, favor tumour escape from standard-of-care treatments in cervical cancer (CC). RAIDs consortium (www.raids-fp7.eu), conducted a prospectively monitored trial, [BioRAIDs (NCT02428842)] with the objectives to generate high quality samples and molecular assessments to stratify patient populations and to identify molecular patterns associated with poor outcome.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Between 2013 and 2017, RAIDs collected a prospective CC sample and clinical dataset involving 419 participant patients from 18 centers in seven EU countries. Next Generation Sequencing has so far been carried out on a total of 182 samples from 377 evaluable (48%) patients, allowing to define dominant genetic alterations</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 May</publication><modification>2026-05-07T01:40:52.95Z</modification><creation>2019-07-24T07:15:57Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6562019</accession><cross_references><pubmed>30952619</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.03.069</doi></cross_references></HashMap>