<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Lee JM</submitter><funding>Beckman Coulter</funding><funding>Korea Health Industry Development Institute</funding><pagination>531</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6580579</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>19(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Clinical microbiology laboratories are asked to process large numbers of urine specimens for culture, but only 20-40% of them are positive. Therefore, a rapid, reliable screening method is necessary to speed up the reporting of a negative result. In this study, we evaluated the iQ200/iChem workstation, which is a combination of digital imaging software and a strip reader to predict negative urine culture.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>A total of 1942 urine specimens were processed through both culture and iQ200/ iChem workstation. We analyzed the performance using two definition of positive urine culture; one or two potential uropathogens at a concentration of ≥10&lt;sup>5&lt;/sup> CFU/ml and ≥ 10&lt;sup>4&lt;/sup> CFU/ml. We assessed combinations of parameters (ASP; all small particles, WBC; leuko</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMC infectious diseases</journal><pubmed_title>Clinical usefulness of iQ200/iChem Velocity workstation for screening of urine culture.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6580579</pmcid><funding_grant_id>HI16C0443</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Baek DJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park KG</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Park YJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Han E</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Clinical usefulness of iQ200/iChem Velocity workstation for screening of urine culture.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Clinical microbiology laboratories are asked to process large numbers of urine specimens for culture, but only 20-40% of them are positive. Therefore, a rapid, reliable screening method is necessary to speed up the reporting of a negative result. In this study, we evaluated the iQ200/iChem workstation, which is a combination of digital imaging software and a strip reader to predict negative urine culture.&lt;h4>Method&lt;/h4>A total of 1942 urine specimens were processed through both culture and iQ200/ iChem workstation. We analyzed the performance using two definition of positive urine culture; one or two potential uropathogens at a concentration of ≥10&lt;sup>5&lt;/sup> CFU/ml and ≥ 10&lt;sup>4&lt;/sup> CFU/ml. We assessed combinations of parameters (ASP; all small particles, WBC; leuko</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Jun</publication><modification>2025-04-18T13:30:50.916Z</modification><creation>2019-07-24T07:20:35Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6580579</accession><cross_references><pubmed>31208347</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12879-019-4141-x</doi></cross_references></HashMap>