<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores><citationCount>0</citationCount><reanalysisCount>0</reanalysisCount><viewCount>46</viewCount><searchCount>0</searchCount></scores><additional><submitter>Siddiqui MS</submitter><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIDDK NIH HHS</funding><pagination>1877-1885.e5</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6609497</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>17(9)</volume><pubmed_abstract>BACKGROUND &amp; AIMS:Noninvasive methods are needed to determine disease stage in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We evaluated the diagnostic performance of several widely available fibrosis models for the assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. METHODS:We performed a retrospective analysis of data from individuals enrolled in the NIDDK NASH Clinical Research Network, from 2004 through 2018. Using biopsy as the reference standard, we determined the diagnostic performance of the aspartate aminotransferase (AST):platelet ratio (APRI), FIB-4, ratio of AST:alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) in a cross-sectional study of 1904 subjects. The ability of these models to detect changes in fibrosis stage was assessed in a longitudinal data set of 292 subjects with 2 biopsies and accompanying laboratory data. Outcomes were detection of fibrosis of any stage (stages 0-4), detection of moderate fibrosis (stages 0-1 vs 2-4), and detection of advanced fibrosis (stages 0-2 vs 3-4). Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the C-statistic, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) analyses. RESULTS:In the cross-sectional study, FIB-4 and NFS outperformed other non-invasive models for detecting advanced fibrosis; the C-statistics were 0.80 for FIB-4 and 0.78 for NFS. In the longitudinal study, 216 patients had non-advanced fibrosis at baseline and 35 patients progressed to advanced fibrosis after median follow up of 2.6 years. After we adjusted for fibrosis stage and model score at initial biopsy, change in APRI, FIB-4, and NFS were significantly associated with change in fibrosis. A unit change in APRI, FIB-4, or NFS was associated with changes in fibrosis stage of 0.33 (95% CI, 0.20-0.45; P &lt; .001), 0.26 (95% CI, 0.15-0.37; P &lt; .001), and 0.19 (95% CI, 0.07-0.31; P = .002), respectively. The cross-validated C-statistic for detecting progression to advanced fibrosis for APRI was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.74-0.89), for FIB-4 was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.73-0.81), and for NFS was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.71-0.88). CONCLUSIONS:In a combined analysis of data from 2 large studies, we found that FIB-4, APRI, and NFS can detect advanced fibrosis and fibrosis progression in patients with NAFLD.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association</journal><pubmed_title>Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive Fibrosis Models to Detect Change in Fibrosis Stage.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6609497</pmcid><funding_grant_id>U01 DK061718</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U24 DK061730</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DK061737</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DK061728</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DK061738</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR002548</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DK061732</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>KL2 TR002648</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DK061713</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DK061734</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DK061731</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U01 DK061730</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>NASH Clinical Research Network</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sherker AH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Buie S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ness E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Donithan M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tonascia J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Van Natta ML</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sternberg A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yates K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carpenter D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chalasani N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kopping M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gonzalez MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Siegner J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Siddiqui MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brandman D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Davila J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fowler K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guy C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yost-Schomer L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Isaacson M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Quist B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gill R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lavine JE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Malik D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vuppalanchi R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lee JJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Poitevin M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gawrieh S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ang B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Freebersyser J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Clark JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kowdley KV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brunt EM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Soo S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sirlin C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Neuschwander-Tetri B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Luketic VAC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hall S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yamada G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Penumatsa R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Miriel L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Robuck PR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wriston K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Neuschwander-Tetri BA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Middleton MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Terrault N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Loomba R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wagoner A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wilson LA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Abdelmalek MF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Piercy D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bhatt A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hameed B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Meinert J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lai J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Doo EC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Van Natta M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Torrance R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jhaveri M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mukhtar N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Boyett S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hallinan E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sandrasegaran K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dasarathy J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sanyal AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cummings OW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cattoor T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Allende D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dasarathy S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ragozzino L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ungermann A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schlosser J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McCullough AJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kigongo C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dodge J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Maher J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Puri P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Stewart S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Torretta S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Diehl AM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bass NM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kleiner DE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>King D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Akhter MF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smith J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hoofnagle JH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Smith M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kirwin S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Behling C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lazo M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bashir M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Belt P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Contos MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yeh M</pubmed_authors><view_count>46</view_count></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive Fibrosis Models to Detect Change in Fibrosis Stage.</name><description>BACKGROUND &amp; AIMS:Noninvasive methods are needed to determine disease stage in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We evaluated the diagnostic performance of several widely available fibrosis models for the assessment of hepatic fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. METHODS:We performed a retrospective analysis of data from individuals enrolled in the NIDDK NASH Clinical Research Network, from 2004 through 2018. Using biopsy as the reference standard, we determined the diagnostic performance of the aspartate aminotransferase (AST):platelet ratio (APRI), FIB-4, ratio of AST:alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) in a cross-sectional study of 1904 subjects. The ability of these models to detect changes in fibrosis stage was assessed in a longitudinal data set of 292 subjects with 2 biopsies and accompanying laboratory data. Outcomes were detection of fibrosis of any stage (stages 0-4), detection of moderate fibrosis (stages 0-1 vs 2-4), and detection of advanced fibrosis (stages 0-2 vs 3-4). Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the C-statistic, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) analyses. RESULTS:In the cross-sectional study, FIB-4 and NFS outperformed other non-invasive models for detecting advanced fibrosis; the C-statistics were 0.80 for FIB-4 and 0.78 for NFS. In the longitudinal study, 216 patients had non-advanced fibrosis at baseline and 35 patients progressed to advanced fibrosis after median follow up of 2.6 years. After we adjusted for fibrosis stage and model score at initial biopsy, change in APRI, FIB-4, and NFS were significantly associated with change in fibrosis. A unit change in APRI, FIB-4, or NFS was associated with changes in fibrosis stage of 0.33 (95% CI, 0.20-0.45; P &lt; .001), 0.26 (95% CI, 0.15-0.37; P &lt; .001), and 0.19 (95% CI, 0.07-0.31; P = .002), respectively. The cross-validated C-statistic for detecting progression to advanced fibrosis for APRI was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.74-0.89), for FIB-4 was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.73-0.81), and for NFS was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.71-0.88). CONCLUSIONS:In a combined analysis of data from 2 large studies, we found that FIB-4, APRI, and NFS can detect advanced fibrosis and fibrosis progression in patients with NAFLD.</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Aug</publication><modification>2020-10-31T09:56:02Z</modification><creation>2020-10-29T17:07:34Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6609497</accession><cross_references><pubmed>30616027</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.cgh.2018.12.031</doi></cross_references></HashMap>