<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Hou SS</submitter><funding>NIBIB NIH HHS</funding><funding>NCI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institutes of Health</funding><pagination>2341-2351</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6659996</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>66(8)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We use a resolution matrix-based Bayesian framework to compare inversion methods for tomographic fluorescence lifetime multiplexing in a diffuse medium, such as biological tissue.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We consider three inversion methods; an asymptotic time domain (ATD) approach, based on a multiexponential analysis of time domain data, a direct time domain (DTD) approach, which is a minimum error solution, and a cross-talk constrained time domain (CCTD) inversion, which is a solution to an optimization problem that minimizes both error and cross-talk. We compare these methods using Monte Carlo simulations and time domain fluorescence measurements with tissue-mimicking phantoms.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The ATD approach provides high accuracy of relative quantitation and spatial localization of two fluorophores embedded in a 18-mm thick turbid medium, with concentration ratios of up to 1:4.25. DTD leads to significant errors in relative quantitation and localization. CCTD provides improved quantitation accuracy over DTD, and better spatial resolution compared to ATD. We present a rigorous theoretical basis for these results and provide a complete derivation of the CCTD estimator. The Bayesian analysis also leads to a formula for rapid computation of the DTD inverse operator for large-scale tomography measurements.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The ATD and CCTD inversion methods provide significant advantages over DTD for accurately estimating multiple overlapping fluorophores.&lt;h4>Significance&lt;/h4>Time domain fluorescence tomography, using zero cross-talk estimators, can serve as a powerful tool for quantifying multiple fluorescently labeled biological processes. The Bayesian framework presented here can be applied to general multiparameter inverse problems for the quantitative estimation of multiple overlapping parameters.</pubmed_abstract><journal>IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering</journal><pubmed_title>The Resolution Matrix in Tomographic Multiplexing: Optimization of Inter-Parameter Cross-Talk, Relative Quantitation, and Localization.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6659996</pmcid><funding_grant_id>R01 CA211084</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 EB000768</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 EB 000768</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 CA 211084</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Kumar ATN</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hou SS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bacskai BJ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The Resolution Matrix in Tomographic Multiplexing: Optimization of Inter-Parameter Cross-Talk, Relative Quantitation, and Localization.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>We use a resolution matrix-based Bayesian framework to compare inversion methods for tomographic fluorescence lifetime multiplexing in a diffuse medium, such as biological tissue.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>We consider three inversion methods; an asymptotic time domain (ATD) approach, based on a multiexponential analysis of time domain data, a direct time domain (DTD) approach, which is a minimum error solution, and a cross-talk constrained time domain (CCTD) inversion, which is a solution to an optimization problem that minimizes both error and cross-talk. We compare these methods using Monte Carlo simulations and time domain fluorescence measurements with tissue-mimicking phantoms.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The ATD approach provides high accuracy of relative quantitation and spatial localization of two fluorophores embedded in a 18-mm thick turbid medium, with concentration ratios of up to 1:4.25. DTD leads to significant errors in relative quantitation and localization. CCTD provides improved quantitation accuracy over DTD, and better spatial resolution compared to ATD. We present a rigorous theoretical basis for these results and provide a complete derivation of the CCTD estimator. The Bayesian analysis also leads to a formula for rapid computation of the DTD inverse operator for large-scale tomography measurements.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The ATD and CCTD inversion methods provide significant advantages over DTD for accurately estimating multiple overlapping fluorophores.&lt;h4>Significance&lt;/h4>Time domain fluorescence tomography, using zero cross-talk estimators, can serve as a powerful tool for quantifying multiple fluorescently labeled biological processes. The Bayesian framework presented here can be applied to general multiparameter inverse problems for the quantitative estimation of multiple overlapping parameters.</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Aug</publication><modification>2025-04-29T10:33:47.508Z</modification><creation>2020-09-11T07:20:32Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6659996</accession><cross_references><pubmed>30582520</pubmed><doi>10.1109/tbme.2018.2889043</doi><doi>10.1109/TBME.2018.2889043</doi></cross_references></HashMap>