<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Ha SM</submitter><funding>Ministry of Science and ICT</funding><funding>Ministry of Health &amp;amp; Welfare, Korea</funding><funding>Korea Health Industry Development Institute</funding><funding>BioNano Health Guard Research Center</funding><funding>Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning</funding><funding>National Research Foundation of Korea</funding><pagination>530-536</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6660342</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>39(6)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Next-generation sequencing is increasingly used for taxonomic identification of pathogenic bacterial isolates. We evaluated the performance of a newly introduced whole genome-based bacterial identification system, TrueBac ID (ChunLab Inc., Seoul, Korea), using clinical isolates that were not identified by three matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Thirty-six bacterial isolates were selected from a university-affiliated hospital and a commercial clinical laboratory. Species was identified by three MALDI-TOF MS systems: Bruker Biotyper MS (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA), VITEK MS (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Étoile, France), and ASTA MicroIDSys (ASTA Inc., Suwon, Kore</pubmed_abstract><journal>Annals of laboratory medicine</journal><pubmed_title>Application of the Whole Genome-Based Bacterial Identification System, TrueBac ID, Using Clinical Isolates That Were Not Identified With Three Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) Systems.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6660342</pmcid><funding_grant_id>H-GUARD_2014M3A6B2060509</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HI17C1807</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>2017M3A7B4039936</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Ha SM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roh J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Choi SB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Byun JH</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yang SJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim CK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yong D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chun J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Application of the Whole Genome-Based Bacterial Identification System, TrueBac ID, Using Clinical Isolates That Were Not Identified With Three Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) Systems.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Next-generation sequencing is increasingly used for taxonomic identification of pathogenic bacterial isolates. We evaluated the performance of a newly introduced whole genome-based bacterial identification system, TrueBac ID (ChunLab Inc., Seoul, Korea), using clinical isolates that were not identified by three matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Thirty-six bacterial isolates were selected from a university-affiliated hospital and a commercial clinical laboratory. Species was identified by three MALDI-TOF MS systems: Bruker Biotyper MS (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA), VITEK MS (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Étoile, France), and ASTA MicroIDSys (ASTA Inc., Suwon, Kore</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Nov</publication><modification>2025-04-05T09:36:10.138Z</modification><creation>2019-11-08T08:04:12Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6660342</accession><cross_references><pubmed>31240880</pubmed><doi>10.3343/alm.2019.39.6.530</doi></cross_references></HashMap>