<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Webster G</submitter><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><pagination>759-770</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6690372</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>74(6)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>After sudden death occurs in the young, first-degree family members should undergo clinical screening for occult cardiac disease, but the diagnostic yield from screening is not well-defined in the United States.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical predictors of cardiac diagnosis in children referred for evaluation following a sudden death in the family.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients referred for a family history of sudden death were evaluated in a retrospective review from a tertiary pediatric referral center.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Among 419 pediatric relatives of 256 decedents, 27% of patients were diagnosed with a disease or had a clinical finding of uncertain significance. Patients were diagnosed with heritable cardiac disease in 39 cases (9.3%). Nonheritable cardiac disease was diagnosed in another 5.5% of patients. Clinical findings of uncertain significance were present in 52 patients (12.4%), including abnormal electrophysiological test results (41 of 52) or imaging test results (11 of 52). Among patients diagnosed with a heritable cardiac disease, the nearest affected relative was almost always a first-degree relative (37 of 39, 95%). The strongest predictors for a successful diagnosis in the patient were an abnormal electrocardiogram and a first-degree relationship to the nearest affected relative (odds ratios: 24.2 and 18.8, respectively).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Children referred for a family history of sudden death receive cardiac disease diagnoses (14%), but clinical findings of uncertain significance increase the challenge of clinical management. The importance of a diagnosis in first-degree affected relatives supports the clinical practice of testing intervening family members first when patients are second- or higher-degree relatives to the decedent.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</journal><pubmed_title>Cardiac Evaluation of Children With a Family History of Sudden Death.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6690372</pmcid><funding_grant_id>U01 HL131914</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR001422</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>K23 HL130554</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>KL2 TR001424</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Webster G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Giancola N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Schoppen ZJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Olson R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Balmert LC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cherny S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>George AL</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Cardiac Evaluation of Children With a Family History of Sudden Death.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>After sudden death occurs in the young, first-degree family members should undergo clinical screening for occult cardiac disease, but the diagnostic yield from screening is not well-defined in the United States.&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical predictors of cardiac diagnosis in children referred for evaluation following a sudden death in the family.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Patients referred for a family history of sudden death were evaluated in a retrospective review from a tertiary pediatric referral center.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Among 419 pediatric relatives of 256 decedents, 27% of patients were diagnosed with a disease or had a clinical finding of uncertain significance. Patients were diagnosed with heritable cardiac disease in 39 cases (9.3%). Nonheritable cardiac disease was diagnosed in another 5.5% of patients. Clinical findings of uncertain significance were present in 52 patients (12.4%), including abnormal electrophysiological test results (41 of 52) or imaging test results (11 of 52). Among patients diagnosed with a heritable cardiac disease, the nearest affected relative was almost always a first-degree relative (37 of 39, 95%). The strongest predictors for a successful diagnosis in the patient were an abnormal electrocardiogram and a first-degree relationship to the nearest affected relative (odds ratios: 24.2 and 18.8, respectively).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>Children referred for a family history of sudden death receive cardiac disease diagnoses (14%), but clinical findings of uncertain significance increase the challenge of clinical management. The importance of a diagnosis in first-degree affected relatives supports the clinical practice of testing intervening family members first when patients are second- or higher-degree relatives to the decedent.</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Aug</publication><modification>2024-02-15T00:07:38.264Z</modification><creation>2020-08-16T07:08:53Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6690372</accession><cross_references><pubmed>31395126</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.jacc.2019.05.062</doi></cross_references></HashMap>