{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Fujino H"],"funding":["Mental Health Okamoto Memorial Foundation"],"pagination":["530"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6701007"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["12(1)"],"pubmed_abstract":["<h4>Objective</h4>The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) is a validated measure to assess interoceptive awareness. Although an earlier study evaluated the Japanese version of the MAIA, it did not examine the measure's test-retest reliability and the data fit of the factor structure. This study aims to further validate the Japanese version of the MAIA.<h4>Results</h4>In this cross-sectional study, 268 Japanese individuals participated. They completed the Japanese version of the MAIA and concurrent validity measures. The test-retest reliability of the Japanese version's subscales ranged from adequate to high (intra-class coefficients = 0.76-0.85). Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the Japanese six-factor structure had a good fit in Japanese. The MAIA subscales were moderately associated with scores on the Body Awareness Scale (rho = 0.25-0.49). The results indicated high test-retest reliability and further confirmed the validity of the six-factor structure of the Japanese version of the MAIA. Hence, the Japanese version of the MAIA is a useful measure to assess interoceptive awareness in the Japanese population."],"journal":["BMC research notes"],"pubmed_title":["Further validation of the Japanese version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness."],"pmcid":["PMC6701007"],"funding_grant_id":["Ken-45"],"pubmed_authors":["Fujino H"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Further validation of the Japanese version of the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness.","description":"<h4>Objective</h4>The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA) is a validated measure to assess interoceptive awareness. Although an earlier study evaluated the Japanese version of the MAIA, it did not examine the measure's test-retest reliability and the data fit of the factor structure. This study aims to further validate the Japanese version of the MAIA.<h4>Results</h4>In this cross-sectional study, 268 Japanese individuals participated. They completed the Japanese version of the MAIA and concurrent validity measures. The test-retest reliability of the Japanese version's subscales ranged from adequate to high (intra-class coefficients = 0.76-0.85). Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the Japanese six-factor structure had a good fit in Japanese. The MAIA subscales were moderately associated with scores on the Body Awareness Scale (rho = 0.25-0.49). The results indicated high test-retest reliability and further confirmed the validity of the six-factor structure of the Japanese version of the MAIA. Hence, the Japanese version of the MAIA is a useful measure to assess interoceptive awareness in the Japanese population.","dates":{"release":"2019-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2019 Aug","modification":"2024-11-20T18:32:55.572Z","creation":"2019-08-31T07:06:24Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC6701007","cross_references":{"pubmed":["31429812"],"doi":["10.1186/s13104-019-4556-x"]}}