<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>90(4)</volume><submitter>Hemmila M</submitter><pubmed_abstract>Background and purpose - The use of trabecular metal (TM) cups for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing. Some recent data suggest that the use of TM in primary THA might be associated with an increased risk of revision. We compared implant survival of Continuum acetabular cups with other commonly used uncemented cups. Patients and methods - Data on 11,390 primary THAs with the Continuum cup and 30,372 THAs with other uncemented cups (reference group) were collected from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated; the endpoint was revision for any reason, for infection, or for dislocation. Revision risks were assessed with adjusted Cox multiple regression models. A subgroup analysis on the use of neutral or elevated liners in the Continu</pubmed_abstract><journal>Acta orthopaedica</journal><pagination>312-317</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6718180</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Survival of 11,390 Continuum cups in primary total hip arthroplasty based on data from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6718180</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Karvonen M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Manninen M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Puhto AP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kettunen J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hemmila M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matilainen M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Makela KT</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Laaksonen I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Eskelinen A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haapakoski J</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Survival of 11,390 Continuum cups in primary total hip arthroplasty based on data from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.</name><description>Background and purpose - The use of trabecular metal (TM) cups for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is increasing. Some recent data suggest that the use of TM in primary THA might be associated with an increased risk of revision. We compared implant survival of Continuum acetabular cups with other commonly used uncemented cups. Patients and methods - Data on 11,390 primary THAs with the Continuum cup and 30,372 THAs with other uncemented cups (reference group) were collected from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated; the endpoint was revision for any reason, for infection, or for dislocation. Revision risks were assessed with adjusted Cox multiple regression models. A subgroup analysis on the use of neutral or elevated liners in the Continu</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Aug</publication><modification>2025-04-18T18:03:30.658Z</modification><creation>2019-09-12T07:04:42Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6718180</accession><cross_references><pubmed>30994043</pubmed><doi>10.1080/17453674.2019.1603596</doi></cross_references></HashMap>