<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Caspi CE</submitter><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><pagination>2548-2557</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6729128</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>21(14)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Hunger relief agencies have a limited capacity to monitor the nutritional quality of their food. Validated measures of food environments, such as the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010), are challenging to use due to their time intensity and requirement for precise nutrient information. A previous study used out-of-sample predictions to demonstrate that an alternative measure correlated well with the HEI-2010. The present study revised the Food Assortment Scoring Tool (FAST) to facilitate implementation and tested the tool's performance in a real-world food pantry setting.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>We developed a FAST measure with thirteen scored categories and thirty-one sub-categories. FAST scores were generated by sorting and weighing foods in categories, multiplying each category's weight share by a healthfulness parameter and summing the categories (range 0-100). FAST was implemented by recording all food products moved over five days. Researchers collected FAST and HEI-2010 scores for food availability and foods selected by clients, to calculate correlations.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Five food pantries in greater Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.&lt;h4>Subjects&lt;/h4>Food carts of sixty food pantry clients.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The thirteen-category FAST correlated well with the HEI-2010 in prediction models (r = 0·68). FAST scores averaged 61·5 for food products moved, 63·8 for availability and 62·5 for client carts. As implemented in the real world, FAST demonstrated good correlation with the HEI-2010 (r = 0·66).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>The FAST is a flexible, valid tool to monitor the nutritional quality of food in pantries. Future studies are needed to test its use in monitoring improvements in food pantry nutritional quality over time.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Public health nutrition</journal><pubmed_title>Refining and implementing the Food Assortment Scoring Tool (FAST) in food pantries.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6729128</pmcid><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR002494</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UL1 TR000114</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Grannon KY</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Caspi CE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nanney MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>King RP</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Refining and implementing the Food Assortment Scoring Tool (FAST) in food pantries.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objective&lt;/h4>Hunger relief agencies have a limited capacity to monitor the nutritional quality of their food. Validated measures of food environments, such as the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010), are challenging to use due to their time intensity and requirement for precise nutrient information. A previous study used out-of-sample predictions to demonstrate that an alternative measure correlated well with the HEI-2010. The present study revised the Food Assortment Scoring Tool (FAST) to facilitate implementation and tested the tool's performance in a real-world food pantry setting.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>We developed a FAST measure with thirteen scored categories and thirty-one sub-categories. FAST scores were generated by sorting and weighing foods in categories, multiplying each category's weight share by a healthfulness parameter and summing the categories (range 0-100). FAST was implemented by recording all food products moved over five days. Researchers collected FAST and HEI-2010 scores for food availability and foods selected by clients, to calculate correlations.&lt;h4>Setting&lt;/h4>Five food pantries in greater Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.&lt;h4>Subjects&lt;/h4>Food carts of sixty food pantry clients.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>The thirteen-category FAST correlated well with the HEI-2010 in prediction models (r = 0·68). FAST scores averaged 61·5 for food products moved, 63·8 for availability and 62·5 for client carts. As implemented in the real world, FAST demonstrated good correlation with the HEI-2010 (r = 0·66).&lt;h4>Conclusions&lt;/h4>The FAST is a flexible, valid tool to monitor the nutritional quality of food in pantries. Future studies are needed to test its use in monitoring improvements in food pantry nutritional quality over time.</description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018 Oct</publication><modification>2024-10-14T20:21:20.685Z</modification><creation>2019-10-11T07:03:46Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6729128</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29808784</pubmed><doi>10.1017/s1368980018001362</doi><doi>10.1017/S1368980018001362</doi></cross_references></HashMap>