<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Christensen K</submitter><funding>Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council</funding><pagination>190518</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6731733</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>6(8)</volume><pubmed_abstract>In a recent paper (Couzi &lt;i>et al.&lt;/i> 2018 &lt;i>R. Soc. open sci.&lt;/i> &lt;b>5&lt;/b>, 180058. (doi:10.1098/rsos.180058)), we proposed a new phenomenological model to account for the I↔II↔"III" phase sequence in incommensurate &lt;i>n&lt;/i>-alkane/urea inclusion compounds, which represents an alternative interpretation to that proposed in work of Toudic &lt;i>et al.&lt;/i> In a Comment (Toudic &lt;i>et al.&lt;/i> 2019 &lt;i>R. Soc. open sci.&lt;/i> &lt;b>6&lt;/b>, 182073. (doi:10.1098/rsos.182073)), Toudic &lt;i>et al.&lt;/i> have questioned our assignment of the superspace group of phase II of &lt;i>n&lt;/i>-nonadecane/urea, which they have previously assigned, based on a (3 + 2)-dimensional superspace, as C222&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub>(00&lt;i>γ&lt;/i>)(10&lt;i>δ&lt;/i>). In this Reply, we present new results from a comprehensive synchrotron single-crystal X-ra</pubmed_abstract><journal>Royal Society open science</journal><pubmed_title>Reply to comment on Couzi &lt;i>et al&lt;/i>. (2018): a phenomenological model for structural phase transitions in incommensurate alkane/urea inclusion compounds.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6731733</pmcid><funding_grant_id>1767012</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Christensen K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Couzi M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Guillaume F</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Harris KDM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Palmer BA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Patterson R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Williams PA</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Reply to comment on Couzi &lt;i>et al&lt;/i>. (2018): a phenomenological model for structural phase transitions in incommensurate alkane/urea inclusion compounds.</name><description>In a recent paper (Couzi &lt;i>et al.&lt;/i> 2018 &lt;i>R. Soc. open sci.&lt;/i> &lt;b>5&lt;/b>, 180058. (doi:10.1098/rsos.180058)), we proposed a new phenomenological model to account for the I↔II↔"III" phase sequence in incommensurate &lt;i>n&lt;/i>-alkane/urea inclusion compounds, which represents an alternative interpretation to that proposed in work of Toudic &lt;i>et al.&lt;/i> In a Comment (Toudic &lt;i>et al.&lt;/i> 2019 &lt;i>R. Soc. open sci.&lt;/i> &lt;b>6&lt;/b>, 182073. (doi:10.1098/rsos.182073)), Toudic &lt;i>et al.&lt;/i> have questioned our assignment of the superspace group of phase II of &lt;i>n&lt;/i>-nonadecane/urea, which they have previously assigned, based on a (3 + 2)-dimensional superspace, as C222&lt;sub>1&lt;/sub>(00&lt;i>γ&lt;/i>)(10&lt;i>δ&lt;/i>). In this Reply, we present new results from a comprehensive synchrotron single-crystal X-ra</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Aug</publication><modification>2025-04-19T03:16:06.763Z</modification><creation>2019-10-16T07:03:09Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6731733</accession><cross_references><pubmed>31599269</pubmed><doi>10.1098/rsos.190518</doi></cross_references></HashMap>