<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Jones MS</submitter><funding>National Institute of Food and Agriculture</funding><funding>National Science Foundation</funding><pagination>eaau8462</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6739092</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>5(9)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Gene drive development is progressing more rapidly than our understanding of public values toward these technologies. We analyze a statistically representative survey (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 1018) of U.S. adult attitudes toward agricultural gene drives. When informed about potential risks, benefits, and two previously researched applications, respondents' support/opposition depends heavily (+22%/-19%) on whether spread of drives can be limited, non-native versus native species are targeted (+12%/-9%), or the drive replaces versus suppresses target species (±2%). The one-fifth of respondents seeking out non-GMO-labeled food are more likely to oppose drives, although their support exceeds opposition for limited applications. Over 62% trust U.S. universities and the Department of Agriculture to research </pubmed_abstract><journal>Science advances</journal><pubmed_title>Does the U.S. public support using gene drives in agriculture? And what do they want to know?</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6739092</pmcid><funding_grant_id>2017-67030-26778</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>1533990</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HATCH NC0250</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>1068676</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Delborne JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mitchell PD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jones MS</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Elsensohn J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brown ZS</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Does the U.S. public support using gene drives in agriculture? And what do they want to know?</name><description>Gene drive development is progressing more rapidly than our understanding of public values toward these technologies. We analyze a statistically representative survey (&lt;i>n&lt;/i> = 1018) of U.S. adult attitudes toward agricultural gene drives. When informed about potential risks, benefits, and two previously researched applications, respondents' support/opposition depends heavily (+22%/-19%) on whether spread of drives can be limited, non-native versus native species are targeted (+12%/-9%), or the drive replaces versus suppresses target species (±2%). The one-fifth of respondents seeking out non-GMO-labeled food are more likely to oppose drives, although their support exceeds opposition for limited applications. Over 62% trust U.S. universities and the Department of Agriculture to research </description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Sep</publication><modification>2025-04-04T22:12:11.446Z</modification><creation>2019-09-26T07:05:32Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6739092</accession><cross_references><pubmed>31535017</pubmed><doi>10.1126/sciadv.aau8462</doi></cross_references></HashMap>