<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>38(4)</volume><submitter>Ma YF</submitter><pubmed_abstract>OBJECTIVE:To assess the value of chitinase 3-like 1 (CHI3L1) alone or in combination with other biomarkers in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. METHODS:Serum samples were collected from 70 patients with pancreatic cancer and 31 healthy subjects and the levels of CHI3L1, CA199, C3, C4, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) in serum were detected. RESULTS:The serum samples from pancreatic cancer patients showed significantly higher CHI3L1, CA199, C3, C4, HDL-C, and LDL-C levels than those from healthy subjects (P&lt;0.05). In patients with pancreatic cancer, serum CHI3L1 level was significantly correlated with the administration of anti-cancer therapy (P&lt;0.05), but not with gender, age, metastasis or other clinicopathological parameters (P&lt;0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that serum CHI3L1, CA199, C3, C4, HDL-C, and LDL-C all had diagnostic value for pancreatic cancer. Multivariate analysis suggested that the combined detection model of CHI3L1, CA199, C3, and HDL-C (AUC=0.964) had a greater diagnostic value than CA199 (AUC=0.896) alone and the combined detection model consisting of CA199, C3, and HDL-C (AUC=0.923; P&lt;0.05). CONCLUSION:Serum levels of CHI3L1, CA199, C3, C4, HDL-C, and LDL-C all have diagnostic value for pancreatic cancer, and the combined model consisting of CHI3L1, CA199, C3, and HDL-C have greater diagnostic efficacy than the other biomarkers either alone or in combination.</pubmed_abstract><journal>Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University</journal><pagination>450-454</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6765668</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>[Detection of chitinase 3-like 1 combined with other biomarkers for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer].</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6765668</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Ma YF</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>He LM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wu Q</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang XQ</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>[Detection of chitinase 3-like 1 combined with other biomarkers for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer].</name><description>OBJECTIVE:To assess the value of chitinase 3-like 1 (CHI3L1) alone or in combination with other biomarkers in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. METHODS:Serum samples were collected from 70 patients with pancreatic cancer and 31 healthy subjects and the levels of CHI3L1, CA199, C3, C4, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) in serum were detected. RESULTS:The serum samples from pancreatic cancer patients showed significantly higher CHI3L1, CA199, C3, C4, HDL-C, and LDL-C levels than those from healthy subjects (P&lt;0.05). In patients with pancreatic cancer, serum CHI3L1 level was significantly correlated with the administration of anti-cancer therapy (P&lt;0.05), but not with gender, age, metastasis or other clinicopathological parameters (P&lt;0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that serum CHI3L1, CA199, C3, C4, HDL-C, and LDL-C all had diagnostic value for pancreatic cancer. Multivariate analysis suggested that the combined detection model of CHI3L1, CA199, C3, and HDL-C (AUC=0.964) had a greater diagnostic value than CA199 (AUC=0.896) alone and the combined detection model consisting of CA199, C3, and HDL-C (AUC=0.923; P&lt;0.05). CONCLUSION:Serum levels of CHI3L1, CA199, C3, C4, HDL-C, and LDL-C all have diagnostic value for pancreatic cancer, and the combined model consisting of CHI3L1, CA199, C3, and HDL-C have greater diagnostic efficacy than the other biomarkers either alone or in combination.</description><dates><release>2018-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2018 Apr</publication><modification>2020-06-16T07:10:27Z</modification><creation>2020-05-22T10:57:31Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6765668</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29735446</pubmed><doi>10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2018.04.13 </doi></cross_references></HashMap>