<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Whitaker J</submitter><funding>British Heart Foundation</funding><funding>Medical Research Council</funding><funding>NHLBI NIH HHS</funding><funding>National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)</funding><funding>Health Innovation Challenge Fund</funding><funding>Wellcome Trust</funding><funding>Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council</funding><pagination>62</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6785908</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>21(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Ex-vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has played an important role in the validation of in-vivo CMR characterization of pathological processes. However, comparison between in-vivo and ex-vivo imaging remains challenging due to shape changes occurring between the two states, which may be non-uniform across the diseased heart. A novel two-step process to facilitate registration between ex-vivo and in-vivo CMR was developed and evaluated in a porcine model of chronic myocardial infarction (MI).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Seven weeks after ischemia-reperfusion MI, 12 swine underwent in-vivo CMR imaging with late gadolinium enhancement followed by ex-vivo CMR 1 week later. Five animals comprised the control group, in which ex-vivo imaging was undertaken without any supp</pubmed_abstract><journal>Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance</journal><pubmed_title>Improved co-registration of ex-vivo and in-vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance images using heart-specific flexible 3D printed acrylic scaffold combined with non-rigid registration.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6785908</pmcid><funding_grant_id>FS/18/27/33543</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>CL-2015-17-502</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>ACF-2013-17-008</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>EP/R010935/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>EP/P01268X/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>HICF-R10-698</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>MR/N001877/1</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 HL129185</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>WT 203148/Z/16/Z</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Chubb H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Niederer S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Razavi R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>O'Neill M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>O'Neill L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Anter E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roujol S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rhode K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Puyol-Anton E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>King A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Byrne N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tschabrunn C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mukherjee RK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Neji R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bishop MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Connolly A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Razeghi O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Whitaker J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nezafat R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Williams SE</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Improved co-registration of ex-vivo and in-vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance images using heart-specific flexible 3D printed acrylic scaffold combined with non-rigid registration.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Ex-vivo cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has played an important role in the validation of in-vivo CMR characterization of pathological processes. However, comparison between in-vivo and ex-vivo imaging remains challenging due to shape changes occurring between the two states, which may be non-uniform across the diseased heart. A novel two-step process to facilitate registration between ex-vivo and in-vivo CMR was developed and evaluated in a porcine model of chronic myocardial infarction (MI).&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>Seven weeks after ischemia-reperfusion MI, 12 swine underwent in-vivo CMR imaging with late gadolinium enhancement followed by ex-vivo CMR 1 week later. Five animals comprised the control group, in which ex-vivo imaging was undertaken without any supp</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Oct</publication><modification>2026-05-07T12:38:54.263Z</modification><creation>2025-05-29T20:17:09.946Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6785908</accession><cross_references><pubmed>31597563</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s12968-019-0574-z</doi></cross_references></HashMap>