<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores><citationCount>0</citationCount><reanalysisCount>0</reanalysisCount><viewCount>60</viewCount><searchCount>0</searchCount></scores><additional><submitter>Hu Y</submitter><funding>Graduate Innovation Fund of Jilin University</funding><funding>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding><pagination>e030497</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6797272</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(10)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To determine the validity and reliability of the Spiritual Care Competency Scale (SCCS) among nurses in China.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Methodological research.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>After the SCCS was translated into Chinese, the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the SCCS (C-SCCS) were evaluated using a convenience sample of 800 nurses recruited from different healthcare centres. The construct validity of the C-SCCS was determined by an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with promax rotation. Pearson's correlation coefficients of the C-SCCS and the Palliative Care Spiritual Care Competency Scale (PCSCCS-M) were computed to assess the concurrent validity and construct validity of the C-SCCS. To verify the quality of the component structure, we conducted a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We tested the internal consistency and stability of the measure using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and the Guttman split-half coefficient, respectively, and a factorial analysis was performed.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 709 participants completed the questionnaire (response rate: 88.63%), and all completed questionnaires were suitable for analysis. Three factors were abstracted from the EFA and explained 58.19% of the total variance. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the three subscales were .93, .92, and .89, and the Guttman split-half coefficient for the C-SCCS was .84. The CFA indicated a well-fitting model, and the significant correlations between the C-SCCS and the PCSCCS-M (r=0.67, p&lt;0.01) showed adequate concurrent validity. Nurses' education and income level showed a significant association with the C-SCCS score.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The C-SCCS was shown to be a psychometrically sound instrument for evaluating Chinese nurses' spiritual care competencies.</pubmed_abstract><journal>BMJ open</journal><pubmed_title>Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the spiritual care competency scale in nursing practice: a methodological study.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6797272</pmcid><funding_grant_id>#81672109</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>101832018C088</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>#81320108025</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Leeuwen RV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hu Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li F</pubmed_authors><view_count>60</view_count></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the spiritual care competency scale in nursing practice: a methodological study.</name><description>&lt;h4>Objectives&lt;/h4>To determine the validity and reliability of the Spiritual Care Competency Scale (SCCS) among nurses in China.&lt;h4>Design&lt;/h4>Methodological research.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>After the SCCS was translated into Chinese, the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the SCCS (C-SCCS) were evaluated using a convenience sample of 800 nurses recruited from different healthcare centres. The construct validity of the C-SCCS was determined by an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with promax rotation. Pearson's correlation coefficients of the C-SCCS and the Palliative Care Spiritual Care Competency Scale (PCSCCS-M) were computed to assess the concurrent validity and construct validity of the C-SCCS. To verify the quality of the component structure, we conducted a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We tested the internal consistency and stability of the measure using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and the Guttman split-half coefficient, respectively, and a factorial analysis was performed.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>A total of 709 participants completed the questionnaire (response rate: 88.63%), and all completed questionnaires were suitable for analysis. Three factors were abstracted from the EFA and explained 58.19% of the total variance. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the three subscales were .93, .92, and .89, and the Guttman split-half coefficient for the C-SCCS was .84. The CFA indicated a well-fitting model, and the significant correlations between the C-SCCS and the PCSCCS-M (r=0.67, p&lt;0.01) showed adequate concurrent validity. Nurses' education and income level showed a significant association with the C-SCCS score.&lt;h4>Conclusion&lt;/h4>The C-SCCS was shown to be a psychometrically sound instrument for evaluating Chinese nurses' spiritual care competencies.</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Oct</publication><modification>2024-02-15T18:01:11.662Z</modification><creation>2019-11-07T08:04:46Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6797272</accession><cross_references><pubmed>31601590</pubmed><doi>10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030497</doi></cross_references></HashMap>