<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Wang Y</submitter><funding>Jiangxi Natural Science Foundation</funding><funding>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding><pagination>15374</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6814815</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>9(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>The optimum granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment for cancer patients after being treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy remains unknown. Therefore, a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis were performed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of 11 G-CSF drugs on patients after chemotherapy. A total of 73 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) containing 15,124 cancer patients were included for the final network meta-analysis. Compared with pegfilgrastim, there were a higher risk with filgrastim for incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) (OR [95% CI]: 1.63 [1.07, 2.46]), and a higher risk with short-acting G-CSF (S-G-CSF) biosimilar and lenograstim for incidence of bone pain (BP) (OR [95% CI]: 6.45 [1.10, 65.73], 5.12 [1.14, 26.12], respectively). Mecapegfilgrast</pubmed_abstract><journal>Scientific reports</journal><pubmed_title>Efficacy and tolerability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in cancer patients after chemotherapy: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6814815</pmcid><funding_grant_id>81460292</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>81560379</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Xu L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fu B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhao N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Li Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Chen L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Liu F</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Efficacy and tolerability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in cancer patients after chemotherapy: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.</name><description>The optimum granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment for cancer patients after being treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy remains unknown. Therefore, a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis were performed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of 11 G-CSF drugs on patients after chemotherapy. A total of 73 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) containing 15,124 cancer patients were included for the final network meta-analysis. Compared with pegfilgrastim, there were a higher risk with filgrastim for incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) (OR [95% CI]: 1.63 [1.07, 2.46]), and a higher risk with short-acting G-CSF (S-G-CSF) biosimilar and lenograstim for incidence of bone pain (BP) (OR [95% CI]: 6.45 [1.10, 65.73], 5.12 [1.14, 26.12], respectively). Mecapegfilgrast</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Oct</publication><modification>2025-04-05T13:18:54.905Z</modification><creation>2019-11-07T08:07:33Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6814815</accession><cross_references><pubmed>31653961</pubmed><doi>10.1038/s41598-019-51982-4</doi></cross_references></HashMap>