<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores><citationCount>0</citationCount><reanalysisCount>0</reanalysisCount><viewCount>44</viewCount><searchCount>0</searchCount></scores><additional><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>59(5)</volume><submitter>Cunningham NA</submitter><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background and objectives&lt;/h4>To determine how the wellbeing of carers of people with dementia is understood and measured in contemporary health research.&lt;h4>Research design and methods&lt;/h4>A systematic review of reviews was designed, registered with PROSPERO, and then conducted. This focused on systematic reviews of research literature published from 2010 onwards; with the wellbeing of carers of people with dementia being a primary focus. N = 19 studies met the inclusion criteria. Quality appraisal was conducted using the AMSTAR tool (2015). A narrative synthesis was conducted to explore how wellbeing is currently being understood and measured.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Contemporary health research most frequently conceptualizes wellbeing in the context of a loss-deficit model. Current healthcare research has not kept pace with wider discussions surrounding wellbeing which have become both more complex and more sophisticated. Relying on the loss-deficit model limits current research in understanding and measuring the lived experience of carers of people with dementia. There remains need for a clear and consistent measurement of wellbeing.&lt;h4>Discussion and implications&lt;/h4>Without clear consensus, health professionals must be careful when using the term "wellbeing". To help inform healthcare policy and practice, we offer a starting point for a richer concept of wellbeing in the context of dementia that is multi-faceted to include positive dimensions of caregiving in addition to recognized aspects of burden. Standardized and robust measurements are needed to enhance research and there may be benefit from developing a more mixed, blended approach to measurement.</pubmed_abstract><journal>The Gerontologist</journal><pagination>e552-e564</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6857741</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><pubmed_title>Understanding and Measuring the Wellbeing of Carers of People With Dementia.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6857741</pmcid><pubmed_authors>Roberston JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cunningham NA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cunningham TR</pubmed_authors><view_count>44</view_count></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Understanding and Measuring the Wellbeing of Carers of People With Dementia.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background and objectives&lt;/h4>To determine how the wellbeing of carers of people with dementia is understood and measured in contemporary health research.&lt;h4>Research design and methods&lt;/h4>A systematic review of reviews was designed, registered with PROSPERO, and then conducted. This focused on systematic reviews of research literature published from 2010 onwards; with the wellbeing of carers of people with dementia being a primary focus. N = 19 studies met the inclusion criteria. Quality appraisal was conducted using the AMSTAR tool (2015). A narrative synthesis was conducted to explore how wellbeing is currently being understood and measured.&lt;h4>Results&lt;/h4>Contemporary health research most frequently conceptualizes wellbeing in the context of a loss-deficit model. Current healthcare research has not kept pace with wider discussions surrounding wellbeing which have become both more complex and more sophisticated. Relying on the loss-deficit model limits current research in understanding and measuring the lived experience of carers of people with dementia. There remains need for a clear and consistent measurement of wellbeing.&lt;h4>Discussion and implications&lt;/h4>Without clear consensus, health professionals must be careful when using the term "wellbeing". To help inform healthcare policy and practice, we offer a starting point for a richer concept of wellbeing in the context of dementia that is multi-faceted to include positive dimensions of caregiving in addition to recognized aspects of burden. Standardized and robust measurements are needed to enhance research and there may be benefit from developing a more mixed, blended approach to measurement.</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Sep</publication><modification>2024-11-06T20:14:33.135Z</modification><creation>2020-05-21T19:14:10Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6857741</accession><cross_references><pubmed>29566167</pubmed><doi>10.1093/geront/gny018</doi></cross_references></HashMap>