<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Cisneros JM</submitter><funding>FP7 Health</funding><pagination>383</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6883535</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>23(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Colistin is recommended in the empirical treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) with a high prevalence of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB). However, the efficacy and safety of colistin are not well defined.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A multicenter prospective randomized trial conducted in 32 European centers compared the efficacy and safety of colistin (4.5 million unit loading dose followed by a maintenance dose of 3 million units every 8 h) versus meropenem (2 g every 8 h), both in combination with levofloxacin (500 mg every 12 h) for 7-14 days in patients with late VAP. Between May 2012 and October 2015, 232 patients were randomly assigned to the 2 treatment groups. The primary endpoint was mortality at 28 days after randomization in the microbiolog</pubmed_abstract><journal>Critical care (London, England)</journal><pubmed_title>Colistin versus meropenem in the empirical treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (Magic Bullet study): an investigator-driven, open-label, randomized, noninferiority controlled trial.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6883535</pmcid><funding_grant_id>278232</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Gonzalez V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sierra R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lepe JA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Polanco MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pozo JC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Malachias S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Seller G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lopez MD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Antonelli M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nakos G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Estella A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bello G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garnacho-Montero J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>de la Torre MV</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Magic Bullet Working Group WP1</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ferrer R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cisneros JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Leal R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Koutsoukou A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pneumatikos I</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jimenez-Jorge S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gutierrez-Pizarraya A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zakinthinos S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Komnos A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Alvarez-Rocha L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Espinosa MC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Roberts E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Diaz-Miguel RO</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ramirez P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Di Gravio V</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Allegue JM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Herrera-Gutierrez ME</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zaragoza R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zakynthinos E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Matthaiou DK</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Bitsan M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dominguez PJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Pascale G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Puppo A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rosso-Fernandez CM</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Villarreal E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zafeiridis T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fernandez-Hinojosa E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dimopoulos G</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Roca-Oporto C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gonzalez A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vidal P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Colistin versus meropenem in the empirical treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (Magic Bullet study): an investigator-driven, open-label, randomized, noninferiority controlled trial.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>Colistin is recommended in the empirical treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) with a high prevalence of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB). However, the efficacy and safety of colistin are not well defined.&lt;h4>Methods&lt;/h4>A multicenter prospective randomized trial conducted in 32 European centers compared the efficacy and safety of colistin (4.5 million unit loading dose followed by a maintenance dose of 3 million units every 8 h) versus meropenem (2 g every 8 h), both in combination with levofloxacin (500 mg every 12 h) for 7-14 days in patients with late VAP. Between May 2012 and October 2015, 232 patients were randomly assigned to the 2 treatment groups. The primary endpoint was mortality at 28 days after randomization in the microbiolog</description><dates><release>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2019 Nov</publication><modification>2026-05-04T11:32:32.693Z</modification><creation>2020-05-21T20:49:56Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6883535</accession><cross_references><pubmed>31779711</pubmed><doi>10.1186/s13054-019-2627-y</doi></cross_references></HashMap>