{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["George S"],"funding":["NCATS NIH HHS","NIMHD NIH HHS"],"pagination":["55-70"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6884075"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["43(1)"],"pubmed_abstract":["Because of their shared backgrounds, community health workers' (CHWs) care of patients/program participants (PAPAs) is assumed to be acceptable, and often not evaluated empirically. Using PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed 9560 articles from 5 databases, selected 37 articles for full-text review, and developed a 5-dimensional depth analysis (focus, context, meaning, range, and voices) to characterize quality/quantity of PAPA feedback. Depth analyses clarified a spectrum of PAPA responses from extremely positive to ambivalence to outright distrust and frustration with perceived CHW limitations. Designing evaluations with 5-dimensional depth analysis can enhance PAPA feedback quality and improve evidence-based, patient-centered, CHW care delivery."],"journal":["The Journal of ambulatory care management"],"pubmed_title":["Talk to PAPA: A Systematic Review of Patient/Participant (PAPA) Feedback on Interactions With Community Health Workers Using a Depth Analysis Approach."],"pmcid":["PMC6884075"],"funding_grant_id":["KL2 TR000122","U54 MD007598"],"pubmed_authors":["Romo O","Balcazar H","George S","Carrasco E","Dixon LZ","Vides L"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Talk to PAPA: A Systematic Review of Patient/Participant (PAPA) Feedback on Interactions With Community Health Workers Using a Depth Analysis Approach.","description":"Because of their shared backgrounds, community health workers' (CHWs) care of patients/program participants (PAPAs) is assumed to be acceptable, and often not evaluated empirically. Using PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed 9560 articles from 5 databases, selected 37 articles for full-text review, and developed a 5-dimensional depth analysis (focus, context, meaning, range, and voices) to characterize quality/quantity of PAPA feedback. Depth analyses clarified a spectrum of PAPA responses from extremely positive to ambivalence to outright distrust and frustration with perceived CHW limitations. Designing evaluations with 5-dimensional depth analysis can enhance PAPA feedback quality and improve evidence-based, patient-centered, CHW care delivery.","dates":{"release":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2020 Jan/Mar","modification":"2025-05-29T19:37:36.643Z","creation":"2025-05-29T19:37:36.643Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC6884075","cross_references":{"pubmed":["31770186"],"doi":["10.1097/JAC.0000000000000309","10.1097/jac.0000000000000309"]}}