<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>George S</submitter><funding>NCATS NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIMHD NIH HHS</funding><pagination>55-70</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6884075</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>43(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>Because of their shared backgrounds, community health workers' (CHWs) care of patients/program participants (PAPAs) is assumed to be acceptable, and often not evaluated empirically. Using PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed 9560 articles from 5 databases, selected 37 articles for full-text review, and developed a 5-dimensional depth analysis (focus, context, meaning, range, and voices) to characterize quality/quantity of PAPA feedback. Depth analyses clarified a spectrum of PAPA responses from extremely positive to ambivalence to outright distrust and frustration with perceived CHW limitations. Designing evaluations with 5-dimensional depth analysis can enhance PAPA feedback quality and improve evidence-based, patient-centered, CHW care delivery.</pubmed_abstract><journal>The Journal of ambulatory care management</journal><pubmed_title>Talk to PAPA: A Systematic Review of Patient/Participant (PAPA) Feedback on Interactions With Community Health Workers Using a Depth Analysis Approach.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6884075</pmcid><funding_grant_id>KL2 TR000122</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>U54 MD007598</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Romo O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Balcazar H</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>George S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carrasco E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dixon LZ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Vides L</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Talk to PAPA: A Systematic Review of Patient/Participant (PAPA) Feedback on Interactions With Community Health Workers Using a Depth Analysis Approach.</name><description>Because of their shared backgrounds, community health workers' (CHWs) care of patients/program participants (PAPAs) is assumed to be acceptable, and often not evaluated empirically. Using PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed 9560 articles from 5 databases, selected 37 articles for full-text review, and developed a 5-dimensional depth analysis (focus, context, meaning, range, and voices) to characterize quality/quantity of PAPA feedback. Depth analyses clarified a spectrum of PAPA responses from extremely positive to ambivalence to outright distrust and frustration with perceived CHW limitations. Designing evaluations with 5-dimensional depth analysis can enhance PAPA feedback quality and improve evidence-based, patient-centered, CHW care delivery.</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 Jan/Mar</publication><modification>2025-05-29T19:37:36.643Z</modification><creation>2025-05-29T19:37:36.643Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6884075</accession><cross_references><pubmed>31770186</pubmed><doi>10.1097/JAC.0000000000000309</doi><doi>10.1097/jac.0000000000000309</doi></cross_references></HashMap>