biostudies-literature00530Vieni CNIBIB NIH HHSBiomedical Technology Resource CenterNIA NIH HHSNINDS NIH HHSNational Institutes of HealthNIHCenter for Advanced Imaging Innovation and ResearchNIBIBNIGMS NIH HHS116228https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6886883biostudies-literatureUnknown204At very low diffusion weighting the diffusion MRI signal is affected by intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) caused by dephasing of magnetization due to incoherent blood flow in capillaries or other sources of microcirculation. While IVIM measurements at low diffusion weightings have been frequently used to investigate perfusion in the body as well as in malignant tissue, the effect and origin of IVIM in normal brain tissue is not completely established. We investigated the IVIM effect on the brain diffusion MRI signal in a cohort of 137 radiologically-normal patients (62 male; mean age = 50.2 ± 17.8, range = 18 to 94). We compared the diffusion tensor parameters estimated from a mono-exponential fit at b = 0 and 1000 s/mm2 versus at b = 250 and 1000 s/mm2. The asymptotic fitting method allowed for quantitative assessment of the IVIM signal fraction f* in specific brain tissue and regions. Our results show a mean (median) percent difference in the mean diffusivity of about 4.5 (4.9)% in white matter (WM), about 7.8 (8.7)% in cortical gray matter (GM), and 4.3 (4.2)% in thalamus. Corresponding perfusion fraction f* was estimated to be 0.033 (0.032) in WM, 0.066 (0.065) in cortical GM, and 0.033 (0.030) in the thalamus. The effect of f* with respect to age was found to be significant in cortical GM (Pearson correlation ρ = 0.35, p = 3*10-5) and the thalamus (Pearson correlation ρ = 0.20, p = 0.022) with an average increase in f* of 5.17*10-4/year and 3.61*10-4/year, respectively. Significant correlations between f* and age were not observed for WM, and corollary analysis revealed no effect of gender on f*. Possible origins of the IVIM effect in normal brain tissue are discussed.NeuroImageEffect of intravoxel incoherent motion on diffusion parameters in normal brain.PMC6886883K23 AG048622R01 NS088040P41 EB017183P30 AG066512R01-NS088040P41EB017183T32 GM007308T32GM007308Sigmund EEConti BVieni CAdes-Aron BRiviello PFieremans EShepherd TMLui YWNovikov DS53falseEffect of intravoxel incoherent motion on diffusion parameters in normal brain.At very low diffusion weighting the diffusion MRI signal is affected by intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) caused by dephasing of magnetization due to incoherent blood flow in capillaries or other sources of microcirculation. While IVIM measurements at low diffusion weightings have been frequently used to investigate perfusion in the body as well as in malignant tissue, the effect and origin of IVIM in normal brain tissue is not completely established. We investigated the IVIM effect on the brain diffusion MRI signal in a cohort of 137 radiologically-normal patients (62 male; mean age = 50.2 ± 17.8, range = 18 to 94). We compared the diffusion tensor parameters estimated from a mono-exponential fit at b = 0 and 1000 s/mm2 versus at b = 250 and 1000 s/mm2. The asymptotic fitting method allowed for quantitative assessment of the IVIM signal fraction f* in specific brain tissue and regions. Our results show a mean (median) percent difference in the mean diffusivity of about 4.5 (4.9)% in white matter (WM), about 7.8 (8.7)% in cortical gray matter (GM), and 4.3 (4.2)% in thalamus. Corresponding perfusion fraction f* was estimated to be 0.033 (0.032) in WM, 0.066 (0.065) in cortical GM, and 0.033 (0.030) in the thalamus. The effect of f* with respect to age was found to be significant in cortical GM (Pearson correlation ρ = 0.35, p = 3*10-5) and the thalamus (Pearson correlation ρ = 0.20, p = 0.022) with an average increase in f* of 5.17*10-4/year and 3.61*10-4/year, respectively. Significant correlations between f* and age were not observed for WM, and corollary analysis revealed no effect of gender on f*. Possible origins of the IVIM effect in normal brain tissue are discussed.2020-01-01T00:00:00Z2020 Jan2024-11-06T05:38:16.88Z2021-02-20T17:15:48ZS-EPMC68868833158094510.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116228