<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Baker E</submitter><funding>National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)</funding><funding>Academy of Medical Sciences</funding><pagination>3-10</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6913574</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>1</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Wide local excision and adjuvant radiotherapy is the standard of care for early breast cancer. For large tumours, however, mastectomy is frequently recommended as conventional breast-conserving techniques often result in poor cosmetic outcomes. Therapeutic mammaplasty (TM) may extend the boundaries of breast-conserving surgery by combining breast reduction and mastopexy techniques with tumour excision, preserving a natural breast shape and avoiding the need for mastectomy. The prevalence of this operative option among surgeons in the UK and its success rate are unknown. The TeaM study is a multicentre prospective study that aims to investigate the practice and outcomes of TM.&lt;h4>Methods and analysis&lt;/h4>Breast centres performing TM will be invited to participate throug</pubmed_abstract><journal>International journal of surgery protocols</journal><pubmed_title>The TeaM (&lt;i>T&lt;/i>h&lt;i>e&lt;/i>r&lt;i>a&lt;/i>peutic &lt;i>M&lt;/i>ammaplasty) study: Protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to evaluate the practice and outcomes of therapeutic mammaplasty.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6913574</pmcid><funding_grant_id>CL-2012-25-503</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>PB-PG-0214-33065</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>AMS-SGCL8-Potter</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Fairbrother P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Kim B</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Basu N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rattay T</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Trickey A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Mammary Fold Academic and Research Collaborative</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Aggarwal S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Williams K</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Turton P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Potter S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>TeaM Steering Group</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Baker E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Achuthan R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Macmillan RD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gardiner MD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Sutton R</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Holcombe C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jain A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Murphy J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Remoundos D</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Brock L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Ives C</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>The TeaM (&lt;i>T&lt;/i>h&lt;i>e&lt;/i>r&lt;i>a&lt;/i>peutic &lt;i>M&lt;/i>ammaplasty) study: Protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to evaluate the practice and outcomes of therapeutic mammaplasty.</name><description>&lt;h4>Introduction&lt;/h4>Wide local excision and adjuvant radiotherapy is the standard of care for early breast cancer. For large tumours, however, mastectomy is frequently recommended as conventional breast-conserving techniques often result in poor cosmetic outcomes. Therapeutic mammaplasty (TM) may extend the boundaries of breast-conserving surgery by combining breast reduction and mastopexy techniques with tumour excision, preserving a natural breast shape and avoiding the need for mastectomy. The prevalence of this operative option among surgeons in the UK and its success rate are unknown. The TeaM study is a multicentre prospective study that aims to investigate the practice and outcomes of TM.&lt;h4>Methods and analysis&lt;/h4>Breast centres performing TM will be invited to participate throug</description><dates><release>2016-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2016</publication><modification>2025-04-04T20:45:52.001Z</modification><creation>2021-02-25T09:44:40Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6913574</accession><cross_references><pubmed>31851757</pubmed><doi>10.1016/j.isjp.2016.08.001</doi></cross_references></HashMap>