{"database":"biostudies-literature","file_versions":[],"scores":null,"additional":{"submitter":["Aldridge JN"],"funding":["Natural Environment Research Council"],"pagination":["155-182"],"full_dataset_link":["https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6961523"],"repository":["biostudies-literature"],"omics_type":["Unknown"],"volume":["135(1)"],"pubmed_abstract":["Results from a 1D setup of the European Regional Seas Ecosystem Model (ERSEM) biogeochemical model were compared with new observations collected under the UK Shelf Seas Biogeochemistry (SSB) programme to assess model performance and clarify elements of shelf-sea benthic biogeochemistry and carbon cycling. Observations from two contrasting sites (muddy and sandy) in the Celtic Sea in otherwise comparable hydrographic conditions were considered, with the focus on the benthic system. A standard model parameterisation with site-specific light and nutrient adjustments was used, along with modifications to the within-seabed diffusivity to accommodate the modelling of permeable (sandy) sediments. Differences between modelled and observed quantities of organic carbon in the bed were interpreted to"],"journal":["Biogeochemistry"],"pubmed_title":["Comparing benthic biogeochemistry at a sandy and a muddy site in the Celtic Sea using a model and observations."],"pmcid":["PMC6961523"],"funding_grant_id":["noc010012","NE/K001906/1","NE/K001876/1","NE/K001914/1","NE/L003066/1","NE/L002981/1","NE/K001973/1","pml010006","NE/K001787/1","NE/K001922/1","NE/K002058/1","NE/K001744/1","NE/K00204X/1","NE/K002139/1","NE/K001698/1"],"pubmed_authors":["Hull T","McNeill CL","Parker ER","Klar JK","Smith HEK","Aldridge JN","Woodward EMS","Hicks N","Silburn B","Kitidis V","Amoudry LO","Silva T","Sivyer DB","Garcia L","Lessin G","Widdicombe S","van der Molen J","Ingels J","Kroger S"],"additional_accession":[]},"is_claimable":false,"name":"Comparing benthic biogeochemistry at a sandy and a muddy site in the Celtic Sea using a model and observations.","description":"Results from a 1D setup of the European Regional Seas Ecosystem Model (ERSEM) biogeochemical model were compared with new observations collected under the UK Shelf Seas Biogeochemistry (SSB) programme to assess model performance and clarify elements of shelf-sea benthic biogeochemistry and carbon cycling. Observations from two contrasting sites (muddy and sandy) in the Celtic Sea in otherwise comparable hydrographic conditions were considered, with the focus on the benthic system. A standard model parameterisation with site-specific light and nutrient adjustments was used, along with modifications to the within-seabed diffusivity to accommodate the modelling of permeable (sandy) sediments. Differences between modelled and observed quantities of organic carbon in the bed were interpreted to","dates":{"release":"2017-01-01T00:00:00Z","publication":"2017","modification":"2026-05-07T13:49:11.202Z","creation":"2020-05-22T10:12:45Z"},"accession":"S-EPMC6961523","cross_references":{"pubmed":["32009696"],"doi":["10.1007/s10533-017-0367-0"]}}