<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Zhao LP</submitter><funding>National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases</funding><funding>NIAID NIH HHS</funding><funding>NIMH NIH HHS</funding><pagination>e0226803</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC6992005</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>15(1)</volume><pubmed_abstract>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>HIV vaccine trials routinely measure multiple vaccine-elicited immune responses to compare regimens and study their potential associations with protection. Here we employ unsupervised learning tools facilitated by a bidirectional power transformation to explore the multivariate binding antibody and T-cell response patterns of immune responses elicited by two pox-protein HIV vaccine regimens. Both regimens utilized a recombinant canarypox vector (ALVAC-HIV) prime and a bivalent recombinant HIV-1 Envelope glycoprotein 120 subunit boost. We hypothesized that within each trial, there were participant subgroups sharing similar immune responses and that their frequencies differed across trials.&lt;h4>Methods and findings&lt;/h4>We analyzed data from three trials-RV144 (NCT00223080),</pubmed_abstract><journal>PloS one</journal><pubmed_title>Landscapes of binding antibody and T-cell responses to pox-protein HIV vaccines in Thais and South Africans.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC6992005</pmcid><funding_grant_id>UM1 AI069469</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UM1AI068618</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UM1 AI068635</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R21 MH083308</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UM1AI068614</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UM1 AI068614</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R01 AI122991</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UM1AI068635</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>R37 AI054165</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UM1 AI068618</funding_grant_id><funding_grant_id>UM1 AI069453</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Innes C</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Moodie Z</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rerks-Ngarm S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Rouphael N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhao M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Janes HE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Pitisuttithum P</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fong Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Zhao LP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Cohen KW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>McElrath MJ</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fiore-Gartland A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Yates NL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Dintwe O</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gilbert PB</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lazarus E</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Corey L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gray GE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Frahm N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fleurs L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Seaton KE</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Huang Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>De Rosa SC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Garrett N</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Robb ML</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Nitayaphan S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Michael NL</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Tomaras GD</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Carpp LN</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Landscapes of binding antibody and T-cell responses to pox-protein HIV vaccines in Thais and South Africans.</name><description>&lt;h4>Background&lt;/h4>HIV vaccine trials routinely measure multiple vaccine-elicited immune responses to compare regimens and study their potential associations with protection. Here we employ unsupervised learning tools facilitated by a bidirectional power transformation to explore the multivariate binding antibody and T-cell response patterns of immune responses elicited by two pox-protein HIV vaccine regimens. Both regimens utilized a recombinant canarypox vector (ALVAC-HIV) prime and a bivalent recombinant HIV-1 Envelope glycoprotein 120 subunit boost. We hypothesized that within each trial, there were participant subgroups sharing similar immune responses and that their frequencies differed across trials.&lt;h4>Methods and findings&lt;/h4>We analyzed data from three trials-RV144 (NCT00223080),</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020</publication><modification>2026-05-07T21:58:26.858Z</modification><creation>2020-05-22T10:36:10Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC6992005</accession><cross_references><pubmed>31999736</pubmed><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0226803</doi></cross_references></HashMap>