<HashMap><database>biostudies-literature</database><scores/><additional><submitter>Loehberg CR</submitter><funding>Deutsche Krebshilfe</funding><funding>Wolfgang-Lutz-Foundation</funding><pagination>1299-1306</pagination><full_dataset_link>https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-EPMC7181428</full_dataset_link><repository>biostudies-literature</repository><omics_type>Unknown</omics_type><volume>301(5)</volume><pubmed_abstract>PURPOSE:Second opinions in oncology are becoming increasingly important in an era of more complex treatments and a growing demand for information by patients. Therefore, we analyzed their effects and influencing factors like patients' motives, subjective extent of information and satisfaction with communications. METHODS:This prospective study evaluated second opinions for patients with breast cancer or gynecological malignancy. The patients received a questionnaire before and two months after, which inquired expectations, reasons, and satisfaction with the second opinion and the attending physicians. RESULTS:A total of 164 patients were included and the majority had breast cancer (75.0%). Receiving the second opinion made 89.7% feel better informed, their need for information decreased (f</pubmed_abstract><journal>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</journal><pubmed_title>Analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center.</pubmed_title><pmcid>PMC7181428</pmcid><funding_grant_id>110533</funding_grant_id><pubmed_authors>Krebs J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Jud S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Emons J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Meyer J</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Lux MP</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Fasching PA</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Egloffstein S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hack CC</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Loehberg CR</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wunderle M</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Wasner S</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Beckmann MW</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Erim Y</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Haberle L</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Hein A</pubmed_authors><pubmed_authors>Gass P</pubmed_authors></additional><is_claimable>false</is_claimable><name>Analysis of motives and patient satisfaction in oncological second opinions provided by a certified university breast and gynecological cancer center.</name><description>PURPOSE:Second opinions in oncology are becoming increasingly important in an era of more complex treatments and a growing demand for information by patients. Therefore, we analyzed their effects and influencing factors like patients' motives, subjective extent of information and satisfaction with communications. METHODS:This prospective study evaluated second opinions for patients with breast cancer or gynecological malignancy. The patients received a questionnaire before and two months after, which inquired expectations, reasons, and satisfaction with the second opinion and the attending physicians. RESULTS:A total of 164 patients were included and the majority had breast cancer (75.0%). Receiving the second opinion made 89.7% feel better informed, their need for information decreased (f</description><dates><release>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</release><publication>2020 May</publication><modification>2025-04-04T10:25:12.758Z</modification><creation>2020-05-22T18:42:47Z</creation></dates><accession>S-EPMC7181428</accession><cross_references><pubmed>32274639</pubmed><doi>10.1007/s00404-020-05525-2</doi></cross_references></HashMap>